Re: guppi coor system
- From: linas linas org
- To: rlb cs utexas edu (Rob Browning)
- Cc: linas linas org, trow emccta com, grib billgribble com,guppi-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: guppi coor system
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:45:50 -0500 (CDT)
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
> > you compose matrices to get the desired combo. Then, a point in
> > 'modeling coords' is (x,y,z,1) and the point in device coords is
> > just M * (x,y,z,1) (well, technically, for true 3d, to get
> > perspective effects, you need to divide by z at this point, and you
> > had to set up a funny matrix for get the perspective to work, but
> > we're not doing 3d right? :-) )
>
> And even if we were, most of it's not that hard, and as you point out,
> using homogeneous coordinates (as you've suggested) makes it so that
> you can represent any composition of operations as a single composite
> matrix which represents a fixed computational cost, per-pixel.
Ack! NOOOOOO!
There is some fundamental miscommunication here. This is *not* per
pixel! We don't want anything per pixel!
Coordinate systems is a concept one uses just to specify the endpoints
of a line, the radius & center of a circle, etc. There's nothing in
here having to do with pixels!
-------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]