Re: GUPnP 0.19 Unstable cycle
- From: Jens Georg <mail jensge org>
- To: "Burton, Ross" <ross burton intel com>
- Cc: gupnp-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GUPnP 0.19 Unstable cycle
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 18:08:38 +0200
On Do, 2012-05-03 at 15:26 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 3 May 2012 15:25, Jens Georg <mail jensge org> wrote:
> > On Do, 2012-05-03 at 14:57 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> On 3 May 2012 14:55, Jens Georg <mail jensge org> wrote:
> >> > If noone objects I will move master into a state where it's possible to
> >> > break API and ABI so we can merge all the patches that have accumulated
> >> > which would do so, including the connman patch with its glib 2.28
> >> > dependency.
> >> Hm, really? I was hoping to see a stable release with the connman
> >> support enabled pretty shortly. I didn't notice that it bought a glib
> >> bump along for the ride.
> > Actually it's just g_variant_lookup. I think I can backport that.
> That would be fantastic.
I opted for "If you want to use connman, you need 2.28".
] [Thread Prev