Re: RFC: Change of context-manager fall-back



On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jens Georg <mail jensge org> wrote:
> Hi,

Hey,

> I was wondering if we should change the fall-back chain for our
> context-managers. Currently we fall-back to the static dumb Unix manager
> if the more sophisticated compiled-in manager is not available.
>
> I'm wondering if we should drop to Linux first (on Linux only obviously)
> and only drop to Unix if we don't have netlink available.

Sounds good. Lennart even proposed that we simply drop NM context
manager too if we have a a working netlink-based one.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]