Re: [PATCH] Only reply if a valid MX header is present



On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Zachary Goldberg <zach zachgoldberg com> wrote:
> Nothing.... :)

  This question is not very simple. Rygel/GUPnP themselves are not the
target of such testing but rather the products build on them for a
particular device category so while many of the tests may apply
directly to upstream Rygel/GUPnP, many of them will only apply to a
particular configuration of it for a particular device class.

  BTW, some years ago gupnp-dlna was created (rather than putting the
code in gupnp-av) despite the fact that it meant a lot more
maintenance burdon for us. Keeping in mind that you are an
introspection hacker and were one of the two proponents of keeping
this library separate, I would appreciate if you could add
introspection to this library. Should be a piece of cake for you, no?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]