Re: [PATCH] Only reply if a valid MX header is present
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak gnome org>
- To: Zachary Goldberg <zach zachgoldberg com>
- Cc: gupnp-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only reply if a valid MX header is present
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:21:44 +0300
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Zachary Goldberg <zach zachgoldberg com> wrote:
> Nothing.... :)
This question is not very simple. Rygel/GUPnP themselves are not the
target of such testing but rather the products build on them for a
particular device category so while many of the tests may apply
directly to upstream Rygel/GUPnP, many of them will only apply to a
particular configuration of it for a particular device class.
BTW, some years ago gupnp-dlna was created (rather than putting the
code in gupnp-av) despite the fact that it meant a lot more
maintenance burdon for us. Keeping in mind that you are an
introspection hacker and were one of the two proponents of keeping
this library separate, I would appreciate if you could add
introspection to this library. Should be a piece of cake for you, no?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]