Re: [PATCH] Add a basic date format check to DIDL-Lite parser
- From: Sven Neumann <s neumann raumfeld com>
- To: Jens Georg <mail jensge org>
- Cc: "gupnp-list gnome org" <gupnp-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a basic date format check to DIDL-Lite parser
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:48:12 +0200
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 09:58 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
> > Could we try to keep the DIDL-Lite parser as efficient as possible? It
> > is already rather slow the way it is implemented right now. This is a
> > real problem on embedded devices.
>
> Can you point out the other issues you're seeing? Maybe we can fix them
> this cycle?
I can't point at a particular issue. All I can say is that parsing
DIDL-Lite takes a considerable amount of CPU cycles. It might help to
use a SAX based parser instead of building the DOM, but that would be a
major rewrite of gupnp-av and I am not sure if it's worth the effort.
Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]