Re: [gupnp] GUPnP DLNA 0.4.0
- From: Arun Raghavan <arun raghavan collabora co uk>
- To: gupnp o-hand com
- Subject: Re: [gupnp] GUPnP DLNA 0.4.0
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:05:35 +0530
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 22:27 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Arun Raghavan
> <arun raghavan collabora co uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:30 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Arun Raghavan
> >> <arun raghavan collabora co uk> wrote:
> >> > Hello!
> >> > The first stable release of GUPnP DLNA, 0.4.0 is out! There aren't many
> >> > changes from 0.3.1, with one exception:
> >> >
> >> > WARNING: gupnp-dlna can temporarily not safely be linked against any
> >> > application which uses pbutils from gst-plugins-base newer than 0.10.30
> >> > (that is, from git at the time of writing this) .
> >> Just to clarify this statement. Does this mean that you can not use
> >> this release of gupnp-dlna with a distribution that ships g-p-b
> >> 0.10.30? If that is the case when is that due to be fixed?
> > No it does not. Let me clarify:
> > 1. You can have any version of gst-plugins-base and gupnp-dlna-0.4.0
> > installed on your system concurrently. There is no problem with this.
> > 2. If you are using an app that uses both pbutils and gupnp-dlna-0.4.0,
> > it will break *if* you use gst-plugins-base 0.10.31 (i.e. the next
> > release). As far as I know, there isn't any published app currently that
> > uses both these libraries.
> > 3. There /should/ be a newer version of gupnp-dlna that works with
> > gst-plugins-base 0.10.31 and later by the time gst-plugins-base-0.10.31
> > is released.
> > I hope this makes things clear.
> Thanks for the clarification. Will the next release mean that
> gupnp-dlna won't need a packaged gst-convenience ?
We also depend on gstprofile, so the internal copy will only go away
entirely when this bug is resolved as well -
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com
] [Thread Prev