On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 10:13 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > Thanks for committing so quickly. Unfortunately we figured out this > morning that the patch is not needed for upstream gupnp. Zeeshan Ali > already fixed the problem in July and his fix does actually work much > better. The patch I sent yesterday doesn't do any harm, but it is not > needed. Please revert it and please excuse the inconveniences. We will > be porting our code to the latest gupnp releases as soon as we get out > of release pressure here. Currently we are still stuck with 0.12.8 :-( Done. Ross -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part