Re: [gupnp] More on multinet
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: gupnp o-hand com
- Subject: Re: [gupnp] More on multinet
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:18:11 +0300
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Hugo<hugo calleja gmail com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why not just a signal with a gboolean
>
> public signal void control_point_available (ControlPoint control_point,
> gboolean available);
>
> Personally I prefer to connect one callback to a signal instead of two.
Sorry with so many things on my immediate TODO list, i forgot to
inform everyone that I went for a much simpler solution:
http://gitorious.org/gupnp/mainline/commit/97d0703d5c5125a129c5867fff56b86a5ba5e7bf
. Seems to work pretty well and control point apps only need to handle
context-available signal and one manager.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]