Re: [gupnp] Re: [PATCH] Workaround for broken printf() implementations.

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi Sven,

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)<zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Sven Neumann<s neumann raumfeld com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:36 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>>> Hi Sven,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Sven Neumann<s neumann raumfeld com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:02 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I should probably note that I will also file a bug report against glib.
>>> >
>>> > FYI, that bug report is here:
>>> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590997
>>>
>>>    Thanks for the patch Sven and sorry for the late replay, I was away
>>> from Internet. I've been busy making lots of changes to gupnp-av[1] to
>>> make it completely OO and consistent (the API will break completely
>>> just like it has for gssdp/gupnp) so I'll apply your changes after i
>>> am done with that. :)
>>
>> Are you guys not going to do bug-fix releases from a branch before the
>> API break?
>
>  Sure we could do that! I was only saying I'll do it after i am done
> with these changes, not on top of them.

  I just ported and applied your patch to gupnp-av master. Looking at
the work-load, I don't think I'll be able to make a 0.4 release for
getting this fix out (at least in the near future) unless you can
prepare the release for us?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com