Re: gtkmm tutorial license / FDL

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 12:45 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> I've noticed that there's currently a lot of talk in the Debian camp
> about the FDL, and it seems likely that all documentation that's
> licensed only under the FDL will be removed from the main Debian
> repository (see http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001).

Let's see what the result is. This is a bit too dull for me to follow in
detail, but it seems unnecessary/excessive to me.

Anyway this is a question that the GNOME Documentation team are already
considering. I'll happily use whatever they recommend.

>   It would
> be a shame if the gtkmm documentation had to be removed because of
> this (although presumably it would still be available in the non-free
> section).
> 
> Are any other authors / contributors interested in dual-licensing the
> tutorial to work around this issue?


-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com