Re: SigC::, sigc::, Build Environment, and Main Event Loop Update from deeply-nested recursive functions.

From: "Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>
To: "Ed Leaver" <eleaver sterlingseismic com>
Cc: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>, gtkmm-list gnome org
Subject: Re: SigC::, sigc::, Build Environment, and Main Event Loop Update from deeply-nested recursive functions.
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:59:20 +0100 (CET)

> I can understand why you might not particularly recommend Glade. But at
> the time I started this project, Bakery was in (or appeared to be in) a
> moderately-alpha state,

Bakery has nothing to do with Glade. It is not an alternative to Glade or
glademm.

> Glade was "mature"

glademm is not Glade. You will make your life easier by using the correct
name for various projects.

[snip]

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

References:
- SigC::, sigc::, Build Environment, and Main Event Loop Update from deeply-nested recursive functions.
  - From: Ed Leaver
- Re: SigC::, sigc::, Build Environment, and Main Event Loop Update from deeply-nested recursive functions.
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: SigC::, sigc::, Build Environment, and Main Event Loop Update from deeply-nested recursive functions.
  - From: Ed Leaver

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]