Re: Bug on a very simple test on glibmm...

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:58 +0200, jey zemarmot net wrote:
[snip]
> class Node : public Glib::Object
> {
>     public:
>         Node () {};
> };
[snip]

This doesn't make much sense. There is very little reason to derive from
Glib::Object unless you are wrapping an existing GObject type.

> For now, if you cannot deal with the problem immediately (so forget this
> question if you are able to answer me and give me the reason and the solution
> right now), could someone lead me to another good smart pointer?

So I guess you were doing this just so you could use RefPtr. RefPtr is
not a general purpose smart pointer, as the documentation says. Google
should find you a general purpose shared reference-couting smartpointer,
such as the one in boost.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com