Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?

From: Philip Langdale <plangdale vmware com>
To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
Cc: gtkmm-list mail gnome org
Subject: Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:11:56 -0800

Murray Cumming wrote:


The take_copy parameter is only for use with RefPtr<>.

I have no problem passing copy=false in which case it won't touch
the refcount but the documented semantics for copy=false are that
the wrapper takes ownership of the object which is not what is going
on here.


OK. A documentation patch would be welcome.


It would indeed. Thank you for clarifying all this.

--phil

References:
- Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Philip Langdale
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Philip Langdale
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Philip Langdale
- Re: Glib::wrap with copy=true semantics?
  - From: Murray Cumming

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]