Re: Must widgets stay in context?
- From: rob page <page rob gmail com>
- To: Karen Pease <meme daughtersoftiresias org>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Must widgets stay in context?
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:22:30 +0000
I believe you want to be using Gtk::manage
advbox->add(*Gtk::manage(new class Gtk::Label(_("Misc Settings"))));
(code ripped from one of my programs)
which should be much easier to use dynamically.
Rob.
On 14/12/05, Karen Pease <meme daughtersoftiresias org> wrote:
> Hi - I'm new to gtkmm, and still just starting to get my feet wet. I'm a bit
> confused by something and can't find information in the documentation about
> it - namely, must widgets stay in context after they're added to a container?
> gtkmm forbids, say:
>
> some_frame.add(Gtk::Label("Test"));
>
> because it wants a Gtk::Label&, not a Gtk::Label. Most sample code that I've
> seen have a member variable (say, m_label_test) used like:
>
> SomeClass::SomeClass() : m_label_test("Test")
> {
> some_frame.add(Gtk::Label("Test"));
> }
>
> This seems to suggest to me that gtk cares whether the widget goes out of
> context or not - that it's not copying the widget that I gave it, but
> referencing it by pointer. And thus, it would seem to suggest that this is
> unacceptable:
>
> some_function()
> {
> Gtk::Label label_test("Test");
> some_frame.add(label_test);
> }
>
> If I am correct in this, then how do I deal with a situation in which what
> widgets are used is dynamic? In my application, I have an information frame
> which can display information about any one of a wide range of possible
> objects in a scene, and each object will display different kinds of
> information about itself (it's not the same type of information between
> different objects - a wire may list its current, voltage, resistance,
> conductor material, conductor diameter, etc; a vehicle may list its velocity,
> wind resistance, drag coefficient, G-forces, mass, etc).
>
> Do I have to have a member variable widget for every last label possibility
> even though at any given time the vast majority of them will be unused? That
> would be a pain, at least as far as labels go. I tried creating
> std::vector<Gtk::Label> label_list to store any widgets that got created, but
> that didn't work. Gtk::Label's copy constructor is private, so
> label_list.push_back(Gtk::Label(text)) fails. Right now I'm using a
> roundabout hack, using a std::vector<Gtk::Label*>, filling it with
> label_list.push_back(new Gtk::Label(text)), deferencing the pointers when I
> add them to the frame, and using a cleanup function that deallocates
> everything in label_list when it is no longer used. Needless to say, this is
> ugly. Is there a better way?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> - Karen
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]