Re: libpropc++
- From: Kresimir Sojat <kresimir sojat gmail com>
- To: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: libpropc++
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:10:35 +0200
After reading all your post on sigc++ i'm more confused than before.
Issue here is not can c++ solve this problem with new keywords tomorrow,
or do other libs have same problem, but can gtkmm/sigc++ safely be used
in commercial software at this point. I see there is large list of
companies using it right now, so is it safe to say it can be used without
opening source?
I have custom widgets, they use sigc++ for new signals, but i don't
care about them. I don't care about gui part at all, my only concern
is about Gtk::TreeStore that i use inside my document class. I hook
to it's signals and if i must give source to all parts that use sigc++
will i have to give source of this specific class? If so how to eliminate
this problem?
Thank you all for comments.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]