Re: [Boost Signals & Slots] Vs [libsigc++]

[Martin Schulze <schulze aept rub de>]

Am 18.11.2004 10:50:23 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
> Questions comparing boost::signal to libsigc++ belong on the
> libsigc++
> mailing list. I'm CCing it.
>
> boost::signal was developer in cooperation with Karl Nelson, the main
> original libsigc++ developer. Also, the libsigc++ 2 API was  
> redesigned
> to
> be as much like boost::signal as possible, so that gtkmm can easily
> switch
> to boost::signal if it becomes an API-stable dependency or it is  
> added
> to
> the C++ Standard Library. gtkmm has a long-standing policy of not
> reimplementing things when we can just reuse them.
>
> This part makes no sense to me. It would have to be explained
> properly
> before we could comment:
> "
> Basically, libsigc++ is a monolithic entity covering single and
> multiple-target callbacks, slots, and slot binding, Signals tackles
> only the multiple-target callbacks, relying on other Boost libraries
> (especially Function and Signals) to do most of the work, so it
> integrates cleanly with the rest of Boost.
> "

I'm afraid, I cannot make any sense of this, either. We definately  
don't use any boost libraries in libsigc++. Opposed to this, the boost  
signal/slot-library has dependencies on other boost libraries so it's  
quite big a dependency ...

Regards,

 Martin


> Murray
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As you will see in the forward email below, I was chatting to a
> bloke who
> > works on boost::signal, I wondered how this stacked up against
> libsigc++,
> > and whether there was any chance it could be used in GTKmm and
> suchlike. A
> > GTKmm developer did pop up on the boost list and make the valid
> point that
> > API stability would be a major issue, nevertheless, I thought I'd
> send
> > this
> > out, and see what people here had to say. As I said on the boost
> list, I
> > am
> > thinking more ...
> >
> >> "hey, what do you think to this lads" than an outright "you should
> be
> > using Boost heathens!"
> >
> > I hope such discussion isn't offtopic.
> >
> > Thanks all!
> >
> > Gaz
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boost-users-bounces lists boost org
> > [mailto:boost-users-bounces lists boost org] On Behalf Of Doug
> Gregor
> > Sent: 17 November 2004 15:49
> > To: boost-users lists boost org
> > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots
> >
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2004, at 9:20 AM, Foster, Gareth wrote:
> >> I was just reading some mention of bugs in boost::signal,
> >
> > They weren't actually bugs :)
> >
> >>  is this
> >> implementation in competition with libsigc++? i.e. does it aim to
> do
> >> the
> >> same job, but under a different license, or is there perhaps some
> >> fundamental design difference between the two?
> >
> > The Signals library aims to be much more flexible than libsigc++  
> and
> to
> > have an interface that is more comfortable for Boost. For instance,
> > slots are just function objects with similar signatures (like
> > Boost.Function, because Function is used in Signals), one can
> combine
> > the results of calling multiple slots into a single return value  
> via
> an
> > arbitrary function object, and the lifetime of signals & slots is
> > automatically tied to "trackable" objects used in bind expressions
> to
> > build slots.
> >
> > Basically, libsigc++ is a monolithic entity covering single and
> > multiple-target callbacks, slots, and slot binding, Signals tackles
> > only the multiple-target callbacks, relying on other Boost
> libraries
> > (especially Function and Signals) to do most of the work, so it
> > integrates cleanly with the rest of Boost.
> >
> > 	Doug
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Boost-users mailing list
> > Boost-users lists boost org
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> >
>
>
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list