[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #696 - 3 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 143335] New:  - Docs should mention Gnome::UI::module_info_get(). (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   2. [Bug 143338] New:  - [patch] Gtk::TableList::remove & Gtk::TableList::erase (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   3. [Bug 142599]  - Inappropriate implementation of Gtk::TreeIter::operator bool() (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 11:33:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 143335] New:  - Docs should mention Gnome::UI::module_info_get().

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143335
gnomemm | libgnomeuimm | Ver: 2.0

           Summary: Docs should mention Gnome::UI::module_info_get().
           Product: gnomemm
           Version: 2.0
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: libgnomeuimm
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: onno gmx net


The documentation should mention what to do with the ModuleInfo parameter in the
constructor of Gnome::Main. This is really unclear in the doxygen docs.

IMHO, it should especially mention that one may not create a new ModuleInfo but
instead use Gnome::UI::module_info_get() if creating a Gnome::UI::App-Application. 
Else, some weird errors result.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:37:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 143338] New:  - [patch] Gtk::TableList::remove & Gtk::TableList::erase

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143338
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4

           Summary: [patch] Gtk::TableList::remove & Gtk::TableList::erase
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: 2.4
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: ywhu nmi iii org tw


void TableList::remove(const_reference child)
{
  gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(gparent_),
                       (GtkWidget*)(child.get_widget()->gobj()));
}                                                 /*  ^^^^^^^^^^^ need
'get_widget()' */

TableList::iterator TableList::erase(iterator position)
{
  //Check that it is a valid iterator, to a real item:
  if ( !position.node_|| (position == end()) )
    return end();

  //Get an iterator the the next item, to return:
  iterator next = position;
  next++;

  //Use GTK+ C function to remove it, by providing the GtkWidget*:
 
gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(gparent_),(GtkWidget*)(position->get_widget()->gobj()));
                                                                               
                                           /*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^need 'get_widget()',
too */
  return next;
}

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 16:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 142599]  - Inappropriate implementation of Gtk::TreeIter::operator bool()

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142599
gtkmm | TreeView | Ver: 2.4

daniel elstner gmx net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net  2004-05-18 16:03 -------
Fix committed to CVS:

2004-05-18  Daniel Elstner  <daniel elstner gmx net>

	* gtk/src/treeiter.ccg (TreeIter::operator bool): Put the original
	test for gobject_.stamp != 0 back in place.  The iter_is_valid()
	method provided by model implementations is intended for debugging
	purposes only, and thus should not be used here (bug #142599).

	* gtk/src/treemodel.hg (TreeModel::iter_is_valid): Document that
	the usage of this method as abstract interface is deprecated, and
	that the implementation's iter_is_valid() should be used directly.


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest