Re: [gtkmm] Segfault on spin button initialisation

[Richard Shaw <look_in_sig sig com>]

On Wednesday 21 July 2004 03:32, Carl Nygard wrote:

> Compiler is correct.  C++ Standard (see Stroustrop) specifies that order
> of member initialization follows order of declaration in the class,
> regardless of the order you specify the initializers in your ctor.

Yeah, it seemed an odd way for it to be done, but I think that's probably just 
because I'd never come across this issue before. 

BTW Is there anywhere to get the C++ standard from, other than paying ISO $18 
or whatever it is?

Cheers,
Richard
-- 
jrs65 __at__ cam . ac . uk