[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #728 - 4 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   2. [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   3. [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   4. [Bug 144420]  - Segfault in libsigc++ (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147592
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4

murrayc murrayc com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Gtk::Settings::get_default()|Gtk::Settings::get_default()
                   |should not use RefPtr?      |needs extra reference.



------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-07-15 05:04 -------
Objects that are reference-counted are not owned by any one object - they are
reference-counted. We are just missing a reference. This patch should fix it. I
have committed it to cvs. I see no problem with Gtk::Settings::get_for_screen(),
but tell us if there is.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:06:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147592
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-07-15 05:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=29549)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=29549&action=view)
settings_get_default.patch


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:06:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 147592]  - Gtk::Settings::get_default() needs extra reference.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147592
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4

murrayc murrayc com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:43:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 144420]  - Segfault in libsigc++

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144420
glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x

martin-ml hippogriff de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |martin-ml hippogriff de



------- Additional Comments From martin-ml hippogriff de  2004-07-15 15:43 -------
Can we rely on the fact that these critical two lines in the code:

  self->source_ = 0;
  g_source_destroy(s);

get executed in the right order? Or might there be come caching that prevent
self->source_ from actually being written into memory?

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest