RE: [gtkmm] PropertyProxies vs get/set?
- From: Mike Hearn <mike theoretic com>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [gtkmm] PropertyProxies vs get/set?
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:07:15 +0000
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:46, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> button.property_something() == 2;
> is strange and unusual to a lot of people, even if it's obvious to us.
Really? It seems the most intuitive syntax to me, I hadn't realise some
people found it wierd.
I also hadn't realised these were functions. Why not simply have them as
member variables that hold the proxies, so you can do "button.something
= 2"?
> Feel free to document them - our tools/extra_defs_gen programs should be
> able to extract the properties documentation for reuse by gmmproc. That
> should not be difficult to implement.
Heh, well I noticed that often the GTKmm docs for properties in the
get/set methods are often better than the plain GTK+ ones....
thanks -mike
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]