Re: [gtkmm] RE: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?
- From: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks rogers com>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: libsigc-list gnome org, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] RE: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 13:55:41 -0500
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:39:07 +0100, you wrote:
>Sorry, I mean gcc 2.9*. Actually, I mean gcc <3.2, but I think 3.0/3.1 was
>short-lived.
gcc 3.0 and 3.1 were not widely used, mainstream adoption started with
gcc 3.2
The only problem I can see is that I believe some of the *bsd releases
are still using gcc 2.9* (ie FreeBSD 4.9 is using gcc 2.95.4).
Having said that I think the benefits of moving to gcc 3.2 or better
are significant enough from a C++ standpoint that it should be done
anyway.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
