On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote: > > Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.96. So if we use it in > > gtkmm 2.4, > > gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.96. > > > > Who needs gcc 2.96 and why? > > So, nobody needs gcc 2.96? > Speaking as a developer who uses both gtkmm, and libsigc++ independantly, I see no burning need to support gcc 2.96 in libsigc++ 2 or later. Al -- Alistair Riddoch alriddoch zepler org http://www.zepler.org/~alriddoch/
Attachment:
pgpPfPfcwtMfn.pgp
Description: PGP signature