Re: [gtkmm] A const_iterator for TreeModel?



On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 16:21, Robert Zeh wrote:
> murrayc murrayc com wrote:

> However, you'll still need to have another function definition for the 
> reverse_iterator's.
> There are some corner cases in converting between reverse iterators and 
> forward
> iterators.

What corner cases?  And why wouldn't a template function take care of
it?

Regards,
Carl




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]