RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm is really big
- From: Eric Newman <enewman ati com>
- To: "'seth beere org'" <seth beere org>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm is really big
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:58:19 -0500
I'm sure the problem looks the worst with the smallest program (hello
world). Instead of thinking statically-linked gtkmm binaries are 85% bigger
than gtk+ binaries, maybe you should think they are (x MB) + (y%) bigger. So
as your code size increases, the percentage difference between size of gtkmm
and gtk+ binaries decreases, asymptotically approaching y%. Hopefully y is
small. :-)
Of course this is a simplification, and y probably varies depending on which
parts of gtk+ / gtkmm you're using.
-Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Moore [mailto:seth beere org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:37 AM
> To: gtkmm-list gnome org
> Subject: [gtkmm] gtkmm is really big
>
>
>
> I'm working with a cross-compiled version of gtkmm (against
> gtk-fb). The target system is mips-based, and everything
> /has/ to be statically linked.
>
> After some struggling to get everything happy, I've finally
> succeeded in linking a gtkmm app (hello world). I noticed a
> huge size increase versus a plain old gtk+ app. I've run
> both executables through 'strip --strip-all', and the sizes are:
>
> hello_gtk - 2841K
> hello_gtkmm - 5232K
>
> That's roughly an 85% increase in executable size! Has
> anyone else seen this with a static linkage of gtkmm?
> Everything was built with gcc-2.95 with -O2.
>
> Is this expected? If not, any suggestions on what bloated my build?
>
> Thanks
> -Seth
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]