GNOME.org
 

Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #819 - 10 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   2. [Bug 154973] Sun Forte build problems (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   3. [Bug 129846] libglademm: Gtk::MenuItem accelerators lost during reparenting (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   4. [Bug 129846] libglade: GtkMenuItem accelerators lost during reparenting (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   5. [Bug 160244] New: Long filenames are not correctly distributed. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   6. [Bug 160244] Long filenames are not correctly distributed. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   7. [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   8. [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   9. [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
  10. [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 12:07:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160132
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From bryan reigndropsfall net  2004-12-02 12:07 -------
Created an attachment (id=34406)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=34406&action=view)
egg-c.tar.gz

A C test case demonstrating what rhythmbox and gossip do.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 13:22:53 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 154973] Sun Forte build problems

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154973
gtkmm | build | Ver: 2.4

murrayc murrayc com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Sun Forte: Too few arguments|Sun Forte build problems
                   |for template                |
                   |std::reverse_iterator in    |
                   |gtk/gtkmm/treeiter.h        |



------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-12-02 13:22 -------
Thanks.

Regarding your radiobutton patch:
-   typedef RadioButtonGroup Group;
 Why is this necessary? What error does the compiler show?

Regarding your demowindow change:
+ #if defined(__SUNPRO_CC) && !defined(_REENTRANT)
+ #define _REENTRANT
Could you please explain this? I can't check this in without some comment.

Please try to create real patches in future. It makes things easier:
http://www.gtkmm.org/bugs.shtml#CreatingPatches

> I have tested Studio9 (CC: Sun C++ 5.6 Patch 117550-01 2004/10/12) but it didn't
> like the include-files from libsigc++. 

Could you give us some more details. Where exactly did you see the error, and
what was it? If this is just a libsigc++ error then please file a bug for libsigc++.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 14:00:37 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 129846] libglademm: Gtk::MenuItem accelerators lost during reparenting

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129846
libglade | gtk | Ver: 2.0.x

roger whinlatter uklinux net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|libglademm                  |gtk
            Product|gnomemm                     |libglade
            Version|2.0                         |2.0.x



------- Additional Comments From roger whinlatter uklinux net  2004-12-02 14:00 -------
The basic problem lies with libglade, not libglademm, so I'm transferring it to
the "libglade" component.


Regards,
Roger

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 14:01:17 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 129846] libglade: GtkMenuItem accelerators lost during reparenting

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129846
libglade | gtk | Ver: 2.0.x

roger whinlatter uklinux net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|libglademm: Gtk::MenuItem   |libglade: GtkMenuItem
                   |accelerators lost during    |accelerators lost during
                   |reparenting                 |reparenting



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 14:07:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160244] New: Long filenames are not correctly distributed.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160244
gtkmm | build | Ver: 2.5

           Summary: Long filenames are not correctly distributed.
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: 2.5
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: build
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: roger whinlatter uklinux net


Because GNU automake uses the v7 tar format, there is a maximum pathname length
of 99 characters.  Filenames longer than this get the pathname truncated and
placed in the root directory of the tarfile.

Automake 1.9.3 allows one to select a newer tar format.  The attached patch
illustrates how to implement this.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 14:09:22 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160244] Long filenames are not correctly distributed.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160244
gtkmm | build | Ver: 2.5





------- Additional Comments From roger whinlatter uklinux net  2004-12-02 14:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=34413)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=34413&action=view)
Patch to select newer tar format

Note that you will need to depend on Autoconf 2.59, and so AC_PREREQ in
configure.in will also need updating.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 15:21:34 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160132
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-12-02 15:21 -------
When I run that test case, I get the same warning, though not all of the text:

murrayc murrayc_debian:~/tests/egg-c$ ./test
(test:14643): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3200003 unexpectedly destroyed

The "destroy" signal handler does not seem to make any difference - I tried
commenting it out. Do you see something different?

However, I ran the C++ test case in GNOME 2.9 (FC3), and this is GNOME 2.8
(debian). 

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 15:27:31 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160132
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From bryan reigndropsfall net  2004-12-02 15:27 -------
The warning will be there no matter whether you're in C or C++.  I was talking
to Bastian Nocera and he said that is supposed to happen.

The thing the C example shows is how they actually make the tray icon re-appear.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 15:47:43 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160132
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-12-02 15:47 -------
Here is the backtrace when the "destroy" signal handler is called:

(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/murrayc/tests/egg-c/test

(test:15099): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3800003 unexpectedly destroyed

Breakpoint 1, 0x0804952a in tray_destroyed ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0804952a in tray_destroyed ()
#1  0xb7be8831 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x80f7d40,
    return_value=0x0, n_param_values=1, param_values=0x0,
    invocation_hint=0xbffff518, marshal_data=0x0) at gmarshal.c:77
#2  0xb7bd4330 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x80f7d40, return_value=0x0,
    n_param_values=0, param_values=0x0, invocation_hint=0x0) at gclosure.c:437
#3  0xb7be8335 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x8080890, detail=0,
    instance=0x808b4f8, emission_return=0x0, instance_and_params=0xbffff620)
    at gsignal.c:2435
#4  0xb7be72f7 in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x808b4f8, signal_id=6,
    detail=0, var_args=0xbffff7ac "\uffff") at gsignal.c:2194
#5  0xb7be75f4 in g_signal_emit (instance=0x0, signal_id=0, detail=0)
    at gsignal.c:2238
#6  0xb7e515f5 in gtk_object_dispose (gobject=0x808b4f8) at gtkobject.c:376
#7  0xb7f382bf in gtk_widget_dispose (object=0x808b4f8) at gtkwidget.c:6386
#8  0xb7f3dad2 in gtk_window_dispose (object=0x808b4f8) at gtkwindow.c:1778
#9  0xb7bd6c27 in g_object_run_dispose (object=0x808b4f8) at gobject.c:602
#10 0xb7e51529 in gtk_object_destroy (object=0x808b4f8) at gtkobject.c:361
#11 0xb7f305f5 in gtk_widget_destroy (widget=0x808b4f8) at gtkwidget.c:1913
#12 0xb7e31bc0 in gtk_main_do_event (event=0x80f6d50) at gtkmain.c:1533
#13 0xb7cf2945 in gdk_event_dispatch (source=0x0, callback=0, user_data=0x0)
    at gdkevents-x11.c:2163
#14 0xb7b69262 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x807fc80) at gmain.c:1942
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#15 0xb7b6a358 in g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x807fc80) at gmain.c:2492
#16 0xb7b6a690 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x807fc80, block=1,
    dispatch=1, self=0x8090a48) at gmain.c:2573
#17 0xb7b6acd3 in g_main_loop_run (loop=0x80f7d78) at gmain.c:2777
#18 0xb7e31513 in gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:1173
#19 0x0804961c in main ()

We need to 
a) Stop it being destroyed/disposed. This should happen already.
b) Find some other signal/vfunc that is fired at the same time. Then, we need to
reshow it or reinitialize somehow, but not recreate it.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2004 16:17:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 160132] EggTrayIcon gives error when panel killed

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160132
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-12-02 16:17 -------
I think that the "event" that gtk_main_do_event() is responding to is
GTK_EVENT_DESTROY:

1524        case GDK_DESTROY:
1525          /* Unexpected GDK_DESTROY from the outside, ignore for
1526           * child windows, handle like a GDK_DELETE for toplevels
1527           */

Maybe we can handle that. I think that GDK_DELETE is the same as
signal_delete_event. I don't know how we could stop gtk_main_do_event() from
handling GDK_DESTROY, but maybe we do that already for delete_event for normal
containers.






------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]