Re: [gtkmm] libglademm2 problems with fedora

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:

Please try just removing it from
I've removed it, and it still builds. I can't find anything that refers to that header at all? So should I bundle a patch with the RPM to remove the #include? or remove the file?

For now pllease just remove the line, not the file. I'll remove it from the
cvs too.
OK,  this will be shipped to QA sometime tommorow.

It doesn't need to be replaced by #include <gtkmmconfig.h>?

And I spoke with some fedora guys regarding Changelogs etc. Their general policy is that if the upstream installs it, we should install it.

Upstream means us. I'm sure that the standard source "make install" doesn't
install the ChangeLog anywhere. So why does the rpm install it?

The RPM doesn't do anything special.  Just the following configuration:

./configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-static --enable-shared

Then, when the time comes for make install it does:

make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install

I'll look into it.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]