Re: [gtkmm] libglademm2 problems with fedora

["Michael A. Koziarski" <michael koziarski com>]

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:

> > > Please try just removing it from libglademmconfig.h.in.
> > >      
> > I've removed it,  and it still builds.  I can't find anything that 
> > refers to that header at all?  So should I bundle a patch with the RPM 
> > to remove the #include?  or remove the file? 
> >    
>
> For now pllease just remove the line, not the file. I'll remove it from the
> cvs too.
>  
OK,  this will be shipped to QA sometime tommorow.

It doesn't need to be replaced by #include <gtkmmconfig.h>?


>  
>
> > And I spoke with some fedora guys regarding Changelogs etc.  Their 
> > general policy is that if the upstream installs it,  we should install it.
> >    
>
>
> Upstream means us. I'm sure that the standard source "make install" doesn't
> install the ChangeLog anywhere. So why does the rpm install it?
>  

The RPM doesn't do anything special.  Just the following configuration:

./configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu 
--target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr 
--exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin 
--sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include 
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var 
--sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man 
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-static --enable-shared

Then, when the time comes for make install it does:

make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install

I'll look into it.