Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.8
- From: Ole Laursen <olau hardworking dk>
- To: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.8
- Date: 08 Oct 2003 21:17:30 +0200
Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk> writes:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2003 8:25 pm, Chris Vine wrote:
>
> > I am checking. Put it this way, parent to child conversion with private
> > inheritance has worked with static_cast on every compiler I have used. It
> > is possible that a gcc snapshot has made gcc compliant with the standard
> > after a considerable period of non-compliance, but other outcomes are more
> > likely. (You may have me eating humble pie later).
>
> You have me eating humble pie. The standard requires static_cast to obey
> access controls. Full marks to you, and there are a lot of non-compliant
> compilers out there, and probably quite a lot of code broken by the standard
> now being complied with by gcc. (However, you are a brave man basing your
> findings on an unreleased version of gcc.)
Hah, I even submitted a bug about it in the GCC Bugzilla before being
gently told the truth...
--
Ole Laursen
http://www.cs.auc.dk/~olau/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]