RE: [gtkmm] deleting last childrow of a row



Thnaks for the quick response! So i'ma forced to jump to 2.3 soon? :P 
And i;m still fighting 2.2 ;)

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
For now, I think that operator[] with number_of_items-1 should work. It
should be faster than iterating over them all.

thanks for the hint. This works fine for me.

bart


On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 15:14, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > [mailto:gtkmm-list-admin gnome org] On Behalf Of Stephan Puchegger
> > I am sorry, that I am most likely not the best person to 
> > advise you in this matter, since I usually use glibmm only. 
> > In your case one usually would use a reverse_iterator which 
> > begins at the last element. I had a short look at the 
> > documentation and I found no such thing. I hope, that I am 
> > not wrong. Somebody else should be able to clarify this.
> 
> I just opened this:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128058
> Also see the dependent bug.
> 
> For now, I think that operator[] with number_of_items-1 should work. It
> should be faster than iterating over them all.
> 
> Murray Cumming
> www.murrayc.com
> murrayc usa net
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]