GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #548 - 9 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 126163] New - libgdamm package config dependency problem (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 125969] Changed - scales and scroolbars doesn't emit pressed/released signals (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 126149] Changed - Toolbar + stlport (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 123082] Changed - directfb build (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 126213] New - maybe signals-with-return-types should connect_before (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 89778] Changed - Wrap panel API for gnomemm (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 02:10:25 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126163] New - libgdamm package config dependency problem

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126163

Changed by bland mail ru 

--- shadow/126163	Tue Nov  4 02:10:25 2003
+++ shadow/126163.tmp.9543	Tue Nov  4 02:10:25 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Bug#: 126163
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: All
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: libgdamm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: bland mail ru               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: libgdamm package config dependency problem
+
+It looks like .pc module dependency need to be fixed this way:
+libgda-2.0 -> libgda. I think so because libgda installs libgda.pc file not
+libgda-2.0.pc as it supposed to be.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, chalil boun edu tr
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 08:48:50 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 125969] Changed - scales and scroolbars doesn't emit pressed/released signals

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125969

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/125969	Mon Nov  3 07:36:33 2003
+++ shadow/125969.tmp.903	Tue Nov  4 08:48:50 2003
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From chalil boun edu tr  2003-11-03 07:36 -------
 Created an attachment (id=21153)
 Gtk::Scale do not emit signal button pressed/released
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 08:48 -------
+I found that it works if you use connect_notify (so that you connect 
+before the existing signal handler). It should also work if you 
+derived a new HScale class and overrode on_button_press_event().


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, bux mail15 com
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 12:30:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126149] Changed - Toolbar + stlport

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/126149	Mon Nov  3 17:19:32 2003
+++ shadow/126149.tmp.12124	Tue Nov  4 12:30:40 2003
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
-Severity: critical
+Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: bux mail15 com               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
@@ -32,6 +32,17 @@
 #3  0x0804de6d in ExampleWindow::ExampleWindow() ()
 #4  0x0804eb67 in main ()
 
 I have also encountered a simular problem (the same peace of code) in a
 larger application.
 Then gdb told me something about SigC::clean or something.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 12:30 -------
+Thanks for the report. I would like you to investigate this. If you
+want somebody else to investigate it for you, then please at least
+write down some instructions about how to build "gtkmm + STLPort". And
+it would be nice to have an actual test case for this, but I guess you
+should just be able to name one of the examples for us.
+
+Personally, I have no great incentive to do the work myself.
+
+Also, do all the libsigc++ tests work successfully?


--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, pgasper designadvantage com
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 12:31:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 123082] Changed - directfb build

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123082

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/123082	Mon Oct  6 10:34:04 2003
+++ shadow/123082.tmp.12470	Tue Nov  4 12:31:16 2003
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@
 wrap_init.cc file.
 
 This has already been done for Win32. For instance, see the
 _GTKMMPROC_WIN32_NO_WRAP macro in gtk/src/socket.hg, and the resultant
 #ifdefs in gtk/gtkmm/wrap_init.cc. I don't remember exactly how it's
 implemented, but grep should be helpful.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 12:31 -------
+Do you need more help with this?


--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, murrayc usa net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 12:38:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126213] New - maybe signals-with-return-types should connect_before

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126213

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/126213	Tue Nov  4 12:38:12 2003
+++ shadow/126213.tmp.16678	Tue Nov  4 12:38:12 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+Bug#: 126213
+Product: glibmm
+Version: 2.4.x
+OS: All
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: object
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: maybe signals-with-return-types should connect_before
+
+I think that all signals connect after (so the signal handlers are called
+after existing signal handlers). signals with return types (such as the
+bool *_event signals) also have connect_notify() which connect before, but
+ignore the return value. A normal connect is often impossible because the
+return value has stopped any further processing. Maybe these signals should
+be connected before by default. We should look at what people ususally do
+with the and Python APIs.
+
+I could be confused about some of this.


--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, murrayc usa net
Cc: cactus cactus rulez org
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 14:39:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 89778] Changed - Wrap panel API for gnomemm

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89778

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/89778	Fri Aug 22 05:30:54 2003
+++ shadow/89778.tmp.879	Tue Nov  4 14:39:44 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 89778
 Product: gnomemm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
 
 Now I am running Ximian Gnome, but I still need to install the latest
 gcc and the gtkmm stuff before trying to do anything.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-08-22 05:30 -------
 Sounds good. It's great to know you'll be back with us soon.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 14:39 -------
+Bryan Forbes has checked some mostly-working stuff into
+gnomemm/libpanelappletmm.


--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, bland mail ru
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 15:00:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126163

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/126163	Tue Nov  4 02:10:25 2003
+++ shadow/126163.tmp.18111	Tue Nov  4 15:00:26 2003
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
 URL: 
 Summary: libgdamm package config dependency problem
 
 It looks like .pc module dependency need to be fixed this way:
 libgda-2.0 -> libgda. I think so because libgda installs libgda.pc file not
 libgda-2.0.pc as it supposed to be.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 15:00 -------
+But we check for libgda, not libgda-2.0. I don't see the problem.
+Please give us a patch if you think something is necessary.


--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 20:13:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126163

Changed by bland mail ru 

--- shadow/126163	Tue Nov  4 15:00:26 2003
+++ shadow/126163.tmp.3558	Tue Nov  4 20:13:11 2003
@@ -18,6 +18,15 @@
 libgda-2.0 -> libgda. I think so because libgda installs libgda.pc file not
 libgda-2.0.pc as it supposed to be.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-11-04 15:00 -------
 But we check for libgda, not libgda-2.0. I don't see the problem.
 Please give us a patch if you think something is necessary.
+
+------- Additional Comments From bland mail ru  2003-11-04 20:13 -------
+Problem popups when we try to use pkg-config libgdamm-2.0.
+"Requires: libgda-2.0" record brokes is badly. Besides --libs and
+--cflags stuff broken simple pkg-config --list-all will abort.
+One more typo I meet is -ldamm-1.3 in "Libs:" list. Must be
+-lgdamm-1.3 I guess.
+See complete patch file attached.
+


--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  4 Nov 2003 20:14:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 126163] Changed - libgdamm package config dependency problem

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126163

Changed by bland mail ru 

--- shadow/126163	Tue Nov  4 20:13:11 2003
+++ shadow/126163.tmp.4600	Tue Nov  4 20:14:55 2003
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@
 "Requires: libgda-2.0" record brokes is badly. Besides --libs and
 --cflags stuff broken simple pkg-config --list-all will abort.
 One more typo I meet is -ldamm-1.3 in "Libs:" list. Must be
 -lgdamm-1.3 I guess.
 See complete patch file attached.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From bland mail ru  2003-11-04 20:14 -------
+Created an attachment (id=21202)
+Proposed patch
+



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]