[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #427 - 16 msgs
- From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
- To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
- Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #427 - 16 msgs
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:04:07 -0700
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
You can reach the person managing the list at
gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla. A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
2. [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
3. [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
4. [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
5. [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
6. [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
7. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
8. [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
9. [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
10. [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
11. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
12. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
13. [Bug 112838] Changed - GnomeDateEdit widget construction bug (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
14. [Bug 107660] Changed - Move TreeView screenshots to more appropriate locations (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
15. [Bug 112866] Changed - Fixes and docs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
16. [Bug 112866] Changed - Fixes and docs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc:
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 02:23:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809
Changed by cgustin ibelgique com
--- shadow/112809 Wed May 14 23:00:17 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.12872 Thu May 15 02:23:56 2003
@@ -70,6 +70,21 @@
and submit another patch after we get the details of the patch worked
out and applied. This same goes for
examples/book/treeview/editable_cells/examplewindow.cc. The bool
field in not properly using the Gtk::CellRendererToggle. This has to
be manually created and attached to the column along with a callback
for signal_toggled.
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com 2003-05-15 02:23 -------
+Actually, we have the same symptom with CellRendererPixbuf in
+demos/gtk-demo/example_stockbrowser.cc. That's the reason why there
+is a WIN32 related #ifdef somewhere in the code. Whatever the column
+type, it seems that it is always implicitly converted to a text,
+except if you call the appropriate cell renderer. I have no idea
+where this comes from. Using the testing branch of gcc-3.2.2 on mingw
+does not solve the problem.
+
+According to the recent thread http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-
+list/2003-April/msg00267.html, this has also been observed on debian
+and gentoo.
+
+I guess fixing this bug should be top priority.
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, julian jabber org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:19:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
Changed by max quendi de
--- shadow/93412 Tue Apr 1 16:44:02 2003
+++ shadow/93412.tmp.21420 Thu May 15 09:19:24 2003
@@ -9,12 +9,13 @@
Priority: Normal
Component: build
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: julian jabber org
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
+Cc: max quendi de
Summary: gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2
Here's the error:
ld: multiple definitions of symbol std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::assign(char const*,
@@ -114,6 +115,15 @@
some more in the coming weeks and see if I can get it to work.
The Fink people seem to believe that gtk+ is hell on OS X to begin
with... I think I should try removing Fink and doing it all manually
to see if they're just being KDE enthusiasts or if that's really the
case. I can't seem to find much info about gtk2 on OS X.
+
+------- Additional Comments From max quendi de 2003-05-15 09:19 -------
+Just to clarify something here. The Fink project (I am one of its three project leads)
+is not an "official" entity - Apple does not sponsor us in any way. We are all
+volunteers. It's not as if we are required to port anything. I am very
+astonished by Julian's claims about how we blockade him. The fact that we don't put
+our scarce resources, consisting of volunteers who port stuff to Mac OS X, into this,
+can hardly be attributed negatively to us. gtkmm2 has its problems working here, but
+that's in no way Fink's fault.
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112840
Changed by markus gerwinski de
--- shadow/112840 Wed May 14 12:56:04 2003
+++ shadow/112840.tmp.23028 Thu May 15 11:56:36 2003
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
"sensitive" status of the TextView. If everything was all right, you
should see the color change whenever you click it.
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-14 12:56 -------
But it's never grey. I've tried changing the code. Something is
different on your system.
+
+------- Additional Comments From markus gerwinski de 2003-05-15 11:56 -------
+Very strange. Does the button at least change the "sensitive" status
+on your system? If yes, in what mode does it start?
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: max quendi de
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:08:12 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
Changed by julian jabber org
--- shadow/93412 Thu May 15 09:19:24 2003
+++ shadow/93412.tmp.32694 Thu May 15 14:08:12 2003
@@ -124,6 +124,20 @@
is not an "official" entity - Apple does not sponsor us in any way. We are all
volunteers. It's not as if we are required to port anything. I am very
astonished by Julian's claims about how we blockade him. The fact that we don't put
our scarce resources, consisting of volunteers who port stuff to Mac OS X, into this,
can hardly be attributed negatively to us. gtkmm2 has its problems working here, but
that's in no way Fink's fault.
+
+------- Additional Comments From julian jabber org 2003-05-15 14:08 -------
+The person in charge of the Fink gtk package made it clear to me that
+gtk 2.2 is hell on OS X and that I should probably just try using Qt
+if I wanted a unix app to run on Fink. I don't think I unfairly
+represented that in my comment, but I'm sorry I sounded harsh--I was
+kind of mad at what he said. Nor did I say that Fink is in any way
+official or is in any way required to port anything--Fink is just the
+only means I currently have to try to figure out how to get this stuff
+working. I said that Fink people aren't being very supportive of me
+trying to get gtk 2.2 working--which definitely was the case, at least
+among those in the IRC channel. I don't think I represented Fink as
+some sort of official entity or something which must port gtk 2.2. I
+just said that Fink people weren't helping me. And they weren't.
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: max quendi de
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 93412] Changed - gtkmm2 cvs fails to link on Mac OS 10.2
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
Changed by julian jabber org
--- shadow/93412 Thu May 15 14:08:12 2003
+++ shadow/93412.tmp.3445 Thu May 15 14:14:33 2003
@@ -138,6 +138,13 @@
only means I currently have to try to figure out how to get this stuff
working. I said that Fink people aren't being very supportive of me
trying to get gtk 2.2 working--which definitely was the case, at least
among those in the IRC channel. I don't think I represented Fink as
some sort of official entity or something which must port gtk 2.2. I
just said that Fink people weren't helping me. And they weren't.
+
+------- Additional Comments From julian jabber org 2003-05-15 14:14 -------
+Also, Max, you were the only one who did try helping me, and it may
+very well have been after I posted that comment. You personally have
+been very willing to help me--it's just that when I mention gtk, no
+other Fink people seem to want to even help me understand the errors I
+get.
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc:
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:16:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112776
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112776 Wed May 14 22:40:10 2003
+++ shadow/112776.tmp.14646 Fri May 16 09:16:54 2003
@@ -115,6 +115,10 @@
the directories /Debug and /Release in the same directory as
the .vcproj files. Therefore, it's very ugly and nearly imposible to
get Visual Studio to function properly if ever .vcproj file were in
the same directory. If you move things around I may be able to get
it to work, but I make no guarantees.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-16 09:16 -------
+So, I think I've done what you wanted. Please try the 1.2.5 release
+and tell me if anything needs fixing.
--__--__--
Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc:
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112809 Thu May 15 02:23:56 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.17143 Fri May 16 09:20:43 2003
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@
According to the recent thread http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-
list/2003-April/msg00267.html, this has also been observed on debian
and gentoo.
I guess fixing this bug should be top priority.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-16 09:20 -------
+Could you open a separate bug for that treeview thing?
+
+Cedric, could you check that these MSVC++ .Net 2003 changes in cvs
+have not broken your mingwin build? I noticed that some *_DLL macros
+were removed from *config.in files and I wondered if you need them.
--__--__--
Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gbpeck sbcglobal net
Cc:
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/109826 Thu May 8 19:10:36 2003
+++ shadow/109826.tmp.18230 Fri May 16 09:22:09 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 109826
Product: gtkmm
Version: 2.2
OS: All
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: INCOMPLETE
Severity: minor
Priority: Normal
Component: build
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: gbpeck sbcglobal net
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -135,6 +135,11 @@
I look forward to the new patch. Thanks.
------- Additional Comments From gbpeck sbcglobal net 2003-05-08 19:10 -------
Looks like Matthias picked up gtkmm2 at http://freshrpms.net/, so I'm
not going to package it myself anymore. I'm going to defer the spec
file to him since there's a better chance he'll be keeping it up-to-date.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-16 09:22 -------
+I sent him an email. No reply so far. As ever, the .spec.in file is
+for people who care about it to maintain. Nobody else is going to
+worry about it.
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gene erachampion com
Cc:
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:23:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109882
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/109882 Mon May 12 04:30:59 2003
+++ shadow/109882.tmp.18901 Fri May 16 09:23:16 2003
@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@
the building-on-solaris README does not? It's easier to update the
README than the book, so I'd prefer for the book to say "See the
README". Likewise, the no-exported stuff - that needs to be easy to
update.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-16 09:23 -------
+If the README.win32 stuff is correct, then I'm just going to remove
+all building-gtkmm stuff from the book.
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, markus gerwinski de
Cc:
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112840
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112840 Thu May 15 11:56:36 2003
+++ shadow/112840.tmp.1071 Sat May 17 13:23:38 2003
@@ -62,6 +62,14 @@
But it's never grey. I've tried changing the code. Something is
different on your system.
------- Additional Comments From markus gerwinski de 2003-05-15 11:56 -------
Very strange. Does the button at least change the "sensitive" status
on your system? If yes, in what mode does it start?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-17 13:23 -------
+The color thing seems to be a theme issue. The standard "simple" GNOME
+theme doesn't change the color for inactive edit boxes or TextViews.
+
+For me, it does change the sensitive/insensitive state.
+
+Please check that this isn't a theme/color problem.
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: cgustin ibelgique com
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:24:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112809 Fri May 16 09:20:43 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.1468 Sat May 17 13:24:13 2003
@@ -9,12 +9,13 @@
Priority: Normal
Component: build
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: burrisj linkline com
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
+Cc: cgustin ibelgique com
Summary: Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
This patch adds support for Visual Studio .NET 2003.
------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com 2003-05-12 00:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=16442)
--__--__--
Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: cgustin ibelgique com
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112809 Sat May 17 13:24:13 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.1613 Sat May 17 13:24:38 2003
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-16 09:20 -------
Could you open a separate bug for that treeview thing?
Cedric, could you check that these MSVC++ .Net 2003 changes in cvs
have not broken your mingwin build? I noticed that some *_DLL macros
were removed from *config.in files and I wondered if you need them.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-17 13:24 -------
+Cedric, I CCed you on this bug, because you might not have seen my
+last comment automatically.
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, liam nova-ioe org
Cc:
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:51:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112838] Changed - GnomeDateEdit widget construction bug
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112838
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112838 Mon May 12 10:32:47 2003
+++ shadow/112838.tmp.21527 Sun May 18 08:51:42 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 112838
Product: gnomemm
Version: 2.0
OS: Linux
OS Details: RedHat 9.0
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: FIXED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: libgnomeuimm
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: liam nova-ioe org
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
assertion `g_date_valid (d)' failed
I dont think this is a bug in my implementation, but maybe a problem in the
gnomeui wrapper ?
Thanks
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-18 08:51 -------
+I think this should be fixed in cvs, but I haven't actually built it
+yet. Thanks.
--__--__--
Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:52:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 107660] Changed - Move TreeView screenshots to more appropriate locations
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107660
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/107660 Fri Mar 28 02:51:25 2003
+++ shadow/107660.tmp.21767 Sun May 18 08:52:57 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 107660
Product: gtkmm
Version: 2.2
OS: All
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: FIXED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: reference documentation
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: r burton 180sw com
QAContact: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
Right. In this case, I think either new showing-off screenshots, or we
just close this bug.
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-03-20 07:36 -------
Agreed. We'll add some screenshots, making new ones if necessary or
just reusing the old ones. Sorry for being pedantic.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-18 08:52 -------
+Fixed in cvs.
--__--__--
Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, mxpxfifws yahoo com
Cc:
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112866] Changed - Fixes and docs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112866
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112866 Mon May 12 16:47:43 2003
+++ shadow/112866.tmp.22948 Sun May 18 08:56:37 2003
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
------- Additional Comments From mxpxfifws yahoo com 2003-05-12 16:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=16471)
Fixes and various patches
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-18 08:56 -------
+I cannot open the tarball. I tried it as .tar and .tar.gz. Please give
+us the filename or upload it if it corrupted.
+
+Otherwise, it looks good. Well done.
--__--__--
Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, mxpxfifws yahoo com
Cc:
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 12:03:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112866] Changed - Fixes and docs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112866
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/112866 Sun May 18 08:56:37 2003
+++ shadow/112866.tmp.7491 Sun May 18 12:03:25 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 112866
Product: gnomemm
Version: 2.0
OS: Linux
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: FIXED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: gnome-vfsmm
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: mxpxfifws yahoo com
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-18 08:56 -------
I cannot open the tarball. I tried it as .tar and .tar.gz. Please give
us the filename or upload it if it corrupted.
Otherwise, it looks good. Well done.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-05-18 12:03 -------
+I figured out that it's a tar.bz. Applied. Thanks.
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]