GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #443 - 17 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  16. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  17. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:45:53 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.32534	Tue Jun 24 08:49:09 2003
@@ -889,6 +889,13 @@
   Sooner or later GTK+ should call destroy on that GtkVBox,
   and the Gtk::VBox will then be destroyed in response.
 
 Question:
   How can the GtkVBox cause that a Gtk::VBox is destroyed?
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:49 -------
+I didn't do the check (with the example you told me) if
+  GtkVBox is being destroyed
+yet, but valgrind tells me that there is no instance of it anymore.
+
+Only one/more instances of Gtk::VBox are left (according to valgrind)



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:49:09 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.1551	Tue Jun 24 08:52:03 2003
@@ -896,6 +896,12 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:49 -------
 I didn't do the check (with the example you told me) if
   GtkVBox is being destroyed
 yet, but valgrind tells me that there is no instance of it anymore.
 
 Only one/more instances of Gtk::VBox are left (according to valgrind)
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:52 -------
+Still my assumption is, that for each Gtk::Dialog there is one 
+Gtk::VBox (wrapper) instance that does not get deleted when 
+destroying the Gtk::Dialog.
+



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:54:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:52:03 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.3222	Tue Jun 24 08:54:21 2003
@@ -902,6 +902,22 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:52 -------
 Still my assumption is, that for each Gtk::Dialog there is one 
 Gtk::VBox (wrapper) instance that does not get deleted when 
 destroying the Gtk::Dialog.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 08:54 -------
+> How can the GtkVBox cause that a Gtk::VBox is destroyed?
+
+There is a callback. This is probably an interesting part to look at:
+http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gtkmm-root/gtk-src/object.ccg#205
+(watch out - the cvs directory structure is totally different than a 
+real checkout or a tarball).
+
+You should really check that the GtkVBox is destroyed. I wouldn't 
+just trust valgrind to tell me that. And if it destroyed then I would 
+try to find out why the Gtk::VBox is not also destroyed.
+
+You are doing well. I have meant to write a lifetime document for a 
+long time. The //GTKMM_LIFECYCLE comments are what I will look at 
+when I do that.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, olau hardworking dk
Cc: dimitri stack nl
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:43:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110788

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/110788	Tue Jun 24 05:04:42 2003
+++ shadow/110788.tmp.1809	Tue Jun 24 09:43:10 2003
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-17 03:21 -------
 Thanks, but "A new doxygen is now out (1.3.2)".
 
 ------- Additional Comments From olau hardworking dk  2003-06-24 05:04 -------
 Sorry for the long processing time (exams) - it doesn't work with
 1.3.2 either. The behaviour is exactly the same.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 09:43 -------
+OK, I will add a dependent doxygen bug when the doxygen bugzilla 
+product is working.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:12:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:54:21 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.19879	Tue Jun 24 10:12:54 2003
@@ -918,6 +918,11 @@
 just trust valgrind to tell me that. And if it destroyed then I would 
 try to find out why the Gtk::VBox is not also destroyed.
 
 You are doing well. I have meant to write a lifetime document for a 
 long time. The //GTKMM_LIFECYCLE comments are what I will look at 
 when I do that.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:12 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17730)
+gtk_plus_destroy_src.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:16:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:12:54 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.22228	Tue Jun 24 10:16:29 2003
@@ -923,6 +923,11 @@
 when I do that.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:12 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17730)
 gtk_plus_destroy_src.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:16 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17731)
+gtk_plus_destroy_out.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:16:29 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.25718	Tue Jun 24 10:22:09 2003
@@ -928,6 +928,15 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:16 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17731)
 gtk_plus_destroy_out.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:22 -------
+The on_vbox_destroyed for the GtkVBox appears,
+but no destruction of the Gtk::VBox.
+
+Note: The --enable-debug-refcounting seems not to work, so I added
+"#define DEF_DEBUG_REFCOUNTING" to gtkmmconfig.h
+
+so you can see the results in the attachment gtk_plus_destroy_out.txt



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:22:09 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.30970	Tue Jun 24 10:31:56 2003
@@ -937,6 +937,11 @@
 but no destruction of the Gtk::VBox.
 
 Note: The --enable-debug-refcounting seems not to work, so I added
 "#define DEF_DEBUG_REFCOUNTING" to gtkmmconfig.h
 
 so you can see the results in the attachment gtk_plus_destroy_out.txt
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:31 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17732)
+gtk_plus_destroy_src2.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:31:56 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.31517	Tue Jun 24 10:32:34 2003
@@ -942,6 +942,11 @@
 so you can see the results in the attachment gtk_plus_destroy_out.txt
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:31 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17732)
 gtk_plus_destroy_src2.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:32 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17733)
+gtk_plus_destroy_out2.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:37:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:32:34 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.1498	Tue Jun 24 10:37:58 2003
@@ -947,6 +947,23 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 10:32 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17733)
 gtk_plus_destroy_out2.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 10:37 -------
+> no destruction of the Gtk::VBox.
+
+In the past I have double-checked this by using a derived class and
+putting a std::cout in the derived destructor.
+
+If we are sure that the C instance is being destroyed without the C++
+instance being destroyed, then we need to check whether the destroy
+callback in gtkmm is being called. And if not, why not.
+
+> The --enable-debug-refcounting seems not to work.
+
+Maybe I remembered the name wrong. I'm sure I've used it recently. It
+should be visible in ./configure --help. Sorry, I can't check now. It
+would be best to do it properly.
+



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:37:58 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.3532	Tue Jun 24 10:42:18 2003
@@ -964,6 +964,10 @@
 > The --enable-debug-refcounting seems not to work.
 
 Maybe I remembered the name wrong. I'm sure I've used it recently. It
 should be visible in ./configure --help. Sorry, I can't check now. It
 would be best to do it properly.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 10:42 -------
+By the way, I know it's unpleasant to switch our minds into C mode for
+a few moments. Remember, it's only for a while.



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: cgustin ibelgique com
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:21:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112809	Wed Jun 18 14:45:02 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.25650	Tue Jun 24 11:21:11 2003
@@ -322,6 +322,11 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From crs8 lehigh edu  2003-06-18 14:45 -------
 Okay, this whole forum needs to be removed and tossed into the lake 
 of fire. I started from scratch and got gtkmm 2.2 compiling and 
 running in MSVC 2003 .NET I'm working on a tutorial and I'll post it 
 when I'm done. 
 Chris
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 11:21 -------
+OK. With new project files, I guess? Consider patching the install
+chapter in the "book" or just updating the MSVC++ .NET README if it's
+lengthy and likely to change often.



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, zsdebre telant tvnet hu
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:22:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113688

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/113688	Thu Jun 19 01:51:06 2003
+++ shadow/113688.tmp.26450	Tue Jun 24 11:22:29 2003
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@
 `gtkmm__GtkCellRendererText' has no property named `activatable'
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-06-19 01:51 -------
 Could you try to compile gtkmm statically and post the error log if 
 you get any multiply defined symbols ?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 11:22 -------
+I'm not 100% sure that patching .hg/.ccg files makes any difference to
+a tarball. Are the changes really in the .h/.cc files.
+
+However, I am fairly sure that the debian problem is caused by the
+unrelated gcc bug.



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:22:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 10:42:18 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.26607	Tue Jun 24 11:22:48 2003
@@ -968,6 +968,17 @@
 would be best to do it properly.
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 10:42 -------
 By the way, I know it's unpleasant to switch our minds into C mode for
 a few moments. Remember, it's only for a while.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 11:22 -------
+If the callback is not being called, something like the following is 
+missing somewhere:
+
+   g_signal_connect (object,
+                     "destroy",
+                     G_CALLBACK (&callback_destroy_),
+                     this)
+
+Am I right?



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 11:22:48 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.28296	Tue Jun 24 11:24:32 2003
@@ -979,6 +979,12 @@
    g_signal_connect (object,
                      "destroy",
                      G_CALLBACK (&callback_destroy_),
                      this)
 
 Am I right?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 11:24 -------
+Well, it's probably a bit more subtle/complicated than that. And I 
+think we actually specify a qdata callback. It would be best to find 
+the callback then grep for it. object_base.cc is probably the place 
+to look.



--__--__--

Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:27:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 11:24:32 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.32749	Tue Jun 24 12:27:56 2003
@@ -985,6 +985,19 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 11:24 -------
 Well, it's probably a bit more subtle/complicated than that. And I 
 think we actually specify a qdata callback. It would be best to find 
 the callback then grep for it. object_base.cc is probably the place 
 to look.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 12:27 -------
+The callback for the VBox is registered in 
+ObjectBase::_set_current_wrapper
+with the following(I added some debug-statements):
+
+  g_object_set_qdata_full(object,
+                          Glib::quark_,
+                          this,
+                          &destroy_notify_callback_)
+
+but ObjectBase::destroy_notify_callback_ is never called for the VBox.
+



--__--__--

Message: 17
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 12:27:56 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.2679	Tue Jun 24 12:32:10 2003
@@ -998,6 +998,20 @@
                           Glib::quark_,
                           this,
                           &destroy_notify_callback_)
 
 but ObjectBase::destroy_notify_callback_ is never called for the VBox.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 12:32 -------
+I added the following line in function on_vbox_destroyed() of 
+gtk_plus_destroy_src.txt:
+
+  g_warning("Data of GtkVBox: refcount: %d\n",
+	    ((GObject*)object)->ref_count);
+
+And the output is:
+
+  ** (main:9732): WARNING **: Data of GtkVBox: refcount: 3
+
+How is that to be understood?
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]