Re: [gtkmm] Slots from non-Gtk subclasses.
- From: Christian Meyer <chrisime uni de>
- To: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] Slots from non-Gtk subclasses.
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:12:58 +0100
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:44:02 -0500
Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:
> >Reading that I again feel unconfident about the multiple inheritance
> >"feature" in C++.
>
> nothing that you quoted is directly related to MI, only to the
> so-called "diamond" inheritance pattern.
my point was the diamond, nothing more.
> being able to combine two
> classes into one and optionally add extra functionality is such a
> useful thing its hard to imagine doing with it a lot of the
> time. however, allowing the two parent classes to both derive from the
> another more antecedent class - this is an area where there is room
> for doubt about its utility and/or sense.
Whether it's useful or not, whether it's needed or not:
It's just my opinion that multiple inheritance is the source of errors
(if you're using it when it's not approriate). Thus, I don't like it
and I'm trying to avoid it whereever it is possible.
Greetings,
Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]