Re: [Re: [Re: [gtkmm] status of memberfunctions of Glib::TimeVal ]]

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

Stephan Puchegger <puchs ap univie ac at> wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > I would like to avoid API addition as well as API breakage. It's all API
> > change. We should only do it in emergencies.
> 
[snip]
> And thats why I asked. If you want to keep it the way it is - no problem.
> I really do not want to pester anyone with unwanted (API) changes -
> especially not the maintainers of this great project. I am sorry if I did.
> I just thought that those additions would make the class more useful.
> 
> May I just ask for a sentence what the official position on the class
> TimeVal is? If its "keep it the way it is", I am not going to pester
> any of you with that topic again.

I was not commenting on your patch/questions. I know nothing about them. I was
responding to Karl's general comments about API changes after the freeze.

Feel free to submit patches. Insignificant API changes are allowed at this
point.


Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com