GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #266 - 4 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 97036] New - API issues for pango methods (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot' (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:17:00 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90126	Sat Oct 26 16:04:33 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.20227	Sun Oct 27 15:17:00 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 90126
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: All
 OS Details: 
-Status: REOPENED   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: szombath bifab de               
 TargetMilestone: 3
@@ -448,6 +448,9 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-26 16:04 -------
 On 2nd thoughts, this comment seems like a good reason not to do it:
 
 >> People who have never used Gtk::SHRINK, Gtk::FILL, etc, will have no
 >> problem with the current API?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-27 15:16 -------
+But, what the hell. That's logical, isn't it?



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morus walter xipolis net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:25:13 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97036] New - API issues for pango methods

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97036

Changed by morus walter xipolis net 

--- shadow/97036	Mon Oct 28 11:25:13 2002
+++ shadow/97036.tmp.23374	Mon Oct 28 11:25:13 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Bug#: 97036
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: minor
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: morus walter xipolis net               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: API issues for pango methods
+
+(from my mail to the mailing list)
+
+I would like to make two aditional remarks on the methods I used
+for low level text rendering:
+
+- the method Gdk::Drawable::draw_glyphs, which is used for low level
+  text rendering, takes a c pointer PangoGlyphString* glyphs instead of
+  a Pango::GlyphString object.
+  This is not a problem since one can use the gobj method of
+  Pango::GlyphStringto get the c pointer from the object, but it looks
+  a bit inconsistent to me.
+
+  void  draw_glyphs (const Glib::RefPtr<const GC>& gc, 
+  const Glib::RefPtr<const Pango::Font>& font, int x, int y, 
+  PangoGlyphString* glyphs)
+
+- similar point for pango_shape where no c++ wrapper exists.
+  Again one can use the c function directly by using the gobj methods.
+
+  void pango_shape (const gchar      *text,
+                    gint              length,
+                    PangoAnalysis    *analysis,
+                    PangoGlyphString *glyphs);
+
+Of course both functions are needed for low level text rendering with pango 
+only and this is rather esoteric and discouraged for most uses anyway.
+
+So I wouldn't mind, if you decide not to do anything about this.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morus walter xipolis net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:25:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97036

Changed by morus walter xipolis net 

--- shadow/97036	Mon Oct 28 11:25:13 2002
+++ shadow/97036.tmp.814	Mon Oct 28 14:25:23 2002
@@ -39,6 +39,14 @@
                     PangoGlyphString *glyphs);
 
 Of course both functions are needed for low level text rendering with pango 
 only and this is rather esoteric and discouraged for most uses anyway.
 
 So I wouldn't mind, if you decide not to do anything about this.
+
+------- Additional Comments From morus walter xipolis net  2002-10-28 14:25 -------
+As Martin Schulze pointed out in the mailing list, I was wrong
+about the missing pango_shape wrapper.
+It's a shape mathod for Pango::Item.
+
+Sorry.
+Morus



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:31:13 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot'

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90689

Changed by btb debian org 

--- shadow/90689	Fri Oct 25 22:37:28 2002
+++ shadow/90689.tmp.2348	Mon Oct 28 14:31:13 2002
@@ -113,6 +113,22 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-21 08:53 -------
 Did you get any response from the graphviz maintainer?
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-25 22:37 -------
 Please respond.
+
+------- Additional Comments From btb debian org  2002-10-28 14:31 -------
+Here's what he said:
+
+Bradley Bell wrote:
+> 
+> Hi, are there any plans to move graphviz into main?  It would be
+useful to
+> build the reference documentation that goes into the gtkmm debs.
+
+	I need to have our legal group review the license and get
+	a more definitive answer to AT&T.  At this time we consider
+	this to be non-free due to the licensing issues.
+
+Regards,
+Stephen




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]