[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #274 - 16 msgs
- From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
- To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
- Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #274 - 16 msgs
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 10:54:15 -0800
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
You can reach the person managing the list at
gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla. A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
2. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
3. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
4. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
5. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
6. [Bug 97549] Changed - Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_of_strings causes crashes (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
7. [Bug 97684] New - [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
8. [Bug 97684] Changed - [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
9. [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
10. [Bug 97684] Changed - ]Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
11. [Bug 97729] New - Warning when deleting widgets. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
12. [Bug 97731] New - Widget parents should be containers. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
13. [Bug 97731] Changed - Widget parents should be containers. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
14. [Bug 97729] Changed - Warning when deleting widgets. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
15. [Bug 97741] New - When i compiled my gtkmm2 program and rut it, it throws segfault (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
16. [Bug 97741] Changed - When i compiled my gtkmm2 program and rut it, it throws segfault (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morten wtf dk
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:35:33 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 14:41:07 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.9585 Mon Nov 4 15:35:33 2002
@@ -18,6 +18,13 @@
The purpose of this file is to make it easy for people to build their own
RPMs so they can install gtkmm within the distributions packaging system.
Murray, I hope you can attach the .spec file(s) you have received to this
bug. Then I'm ready to put in my comments and create a patch against CVS.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:35 -------
+This is relevant:
+http://www.advogato.org/article/573.html
+
+Here is the spec file and build patch from Gary Peck
+<gbpeck sbcglobal net>. If only people would stop emailing me directly.
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morten wtf dk
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:36:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 15:35:33 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.9737 Mon Nov 4 15:36:11 2002
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:35 -------
This is relevant:
http://www.advogato.org/article/573.html
Here is the spec file and build patch from Gary Peck
<gbpeck sbcglobal net>. If only people would stop emailing me directly.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:36 -------
+Created an attachment (id=12038)
+gtkmm2.spec
+
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morten wtf dk
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:36:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 15:36:11 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.9807 Mon Nov 4 15:36:45 2002
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
<gbpeck sbcglobal net>. If only people would stop emailing me directly.
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=12038)
gtkmm2.spec
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:36 -------
+Created an attachment (id=12039)
+gtkmm2spec.patch
+
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:03:37 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by morten wtf dk
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 15:36:45 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.8541 Mon Nov 4 18:03:37 2002
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@
------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-04 15:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=12039)
gtkmm2spec.patch
+
+------- Additional Comments From morten wtf dk 2002-11-04 18:03 -------
+Created an attachment (id=12043)
+Patch against CVS to add spec file.
+
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:08:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by morten wtf dk
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 18:03:37 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.9601 Mon Nov 4 18:08:18 2002
@@ -40,6 +40,27 @@
------- Additional Comments From morten wtf dk 2002-11-04 18:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=12043)
Patch against CVS to add spec file.
+
+------- Additional Comments From morten wtf dk 2002-11-04 18:08 -------
+The patch I just added, patches gtkmm.spec.in. I just changed so that
+the version number is automatically inserted by automake (@VERSION@).
+It also incorporates the the gtkmm2spec.patch that you added.
+
+I vote for committing it to CVS, because it's functional on Red Hat
+systems. However; Leave this bug open - because there is a "minor"
+bug. The BuildRequires lines only matches the package names which Red
+Hat uses. While Red Hat uses e.g. "gtk2-devel", Mandrake uses
+"libgtk+2.0_0" as package name for GTK+2. This means that you can
+never satisfy the build dependencies on Mandrake.
+
+I looked and asked around, but it seems that it isn't possible to add
+a "OR" dependency in the BuildRequires. Does anyone have a solution
+for this problem?
+
+If no sensible solution is found, I think the BuildRequires lines
+should just be removed..
+
+
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:28:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97549] Changed - Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_of_strings causes crashes
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97549
Changed by abas aix meng auth gr
--- shadow/97549 Mon Nov 4 11:39:12 2002
+++ shadow/97549.tmp.25827 Mon Nov 4 19:28:03 2002
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Bug#: 97549
Product: gnomemm
-Version: 1.2
+Version: 2.0
OS: other
OS Details:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
@@ -75,6 +75,34 @@
`Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_of_strings (Glib::ustring &)'
/gnome/gnome-2-0/INSTALL/include/gconfmm-2.0/gconfmm/value.h:97:
candidates are: SArray
Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_of_strings () const
If you give me some code that builds then I will investigate it.
+
+------- Additional Comments From abas aix meng auth gr 2002-11-04 19:28 -------
+Oops, yes.. Umm.... yes... The correct code follows.
+And it really is for 2.0. Sorry :-(
+Note that calling client->get_list_of_strings(key) works flawlessly.
+
+#include <gconfmm.h>
+#include <libgnomeuimm/init.h>
+#include <libgnomemm/main.h>
+
+int main(int argc, char**argv){
+ Gnome::Main kit("test","1.0",Gnome::UI::module_info_get(),
+ argc, argv);
+ Glib::RefPtr<Gnome::Conf::Client> client=
+ Gnome::Conf::Client::get_default_client();
+ Glib::ustring key="/apps/test/testkey";
+
+ std::list<Glib::ustring> lst,lst2;
+ lst.push_back("test-string-1");
+ lst.push_back("test-string-2");
+
+ client->set(key,lst);
+ {
+ Gnome::Conf::Value v(client->get(key));
+ lst2=v.get_list_of_strings();
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
--__--__--
Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:43:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97684] New - [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Changed by abas aix meng auth gr
--- shadow/97684 Mon Nov 4 19:43:03 2002
+++ shadow/97684.tmp.28912 Mon Nov 4 19:43:03 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Bug#: 97684
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity: enhancement
+Priority: Normal
+Component: gconfmm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+ReportedBy: abas aix meng auth gr
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Summary: [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
+
+Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was declared, but had no definition.
+This patchlet adds it.
--__--__--
Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:44:24 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97684] Changed - [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Changed by abas aix meng auth gr
--- shadow/97684 Mon Nov 4 19:43:03 2002
+++ shadow/97684.tmp.29109 Mon Nov 4 19:44:24 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
Summary: [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was declared, but had no definition.
This patchlet adds it.
+
+------- Additional Comments From abas aix meng auth gr 2002-11-04 19:44 -------
+Created an attachment (id=12045)
+patch, to be appliend in the gconfmm directory.
+
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morten wtf dk
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:31:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97659] Changed - Need .spec file to make it possible for users to create RPMs
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97659
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97659 Mon Nov 4 18:08:18 2002
+++ shadow/97659.tmp.32619 Tue Nov 5 05:31:16 2002
@@ -61,6 +61,13 @@
for this problem?
If no sensible solution is found, I think the BuildRequires lines
should just be removed..
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-05 05:31 -------
+Applied. Thanks.
+
+Surely this dependency problems happens for every RPMS that needs
+GTK+. If there is no general solution then it's OK with me to just
+support RedHat.
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, abas aix meng auth gr
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:32:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97684] Changed - ]Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97684 Mon Nov 4 19:44:24 2002
+++ shadow/97684.tmp.432 Tue Nov 5 05:32:40 2002
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
Priority: Normal
Component: gconfmm
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: abas aix meng auth gr
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
-Summary: [PATCHLET] Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
+Summary: ]Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was missing
Gnome::Conf::Value::get_list_type() was declared, but had no definition.
This patchlet adds it.
------- Additional Comments From abas aix meng auth gr 2002-11-04 19:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=12045)
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:56:06 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97729] New - Warning when deleting widgets.
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97729
Changed by matty chariot net au
--- shadow/97729 Tue Nov 5 08:56:06 2002
+++ shadow/97729.tmp.8545 Tue Nov 5 08:56:06 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Bug#: 97729
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: TreeView
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+ReportedBy: matty chariot net au
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Summary: Warning when deleting widgets.
+
+Another warning and crash when deleting widgets:
+
+(a.out:13137): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkcontainer.c: line 878
+(gtk_container_remove): assertion `GTK_IS_CONTAINER (container)' failed
+
+I think this might be new since bug #95606 was resolved fixed.
+
+Code:
+
+#include <gtkmm.h>
+
+class Instance {
+public:
+
+ Gtk::Frame widget_frame;
+ Gtk::ScrolledWindow widget_scroll;
+ Instance() { widget_scroll.add( widget_frame ); }
+
+};
+
+int main ( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
+
+ Gtk::Main main( argc, argv );
+
+ Instance *instance = new Instance();
+ delete instance;
+
+}
--__--__--
Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:07:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97731] New - Widget parents should be containers.
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97731
Changed by matty chariot net au
--- shadow/97731 Tue Nov 5 09:07:29 2002
+++ shadow/97731.tmp.10719 Tue Nov 5 09:07:29 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Bug#: 97731
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity: enhancement
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+ReportedBy: matty chariot net au
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Summary: Widget parents should be containers.
+
+You would expect a widget parent to be a Container, yet the APIs have them
+as ordinary Widgets. This leads to excessive casting.
+
+void reparent(Widget & newparent);
+Widget* get_parent();
+const Widget* get_parent() const;
+void on_parent_changed(Widget* previous_parent);
+Glib::SignalProxy1<void,Widget*> signal_parent_changed();
+void set_parent(Widget& parent);
+
+Perhaps oddly, property_parent() is a Container.
+
+Obviously other than the get_parent calls, this change would break API
+compatibility, but only for broken programs anyway.
+
+Perhaps also get_parent should have covariant returns - I would expect
+MenuItem::get_parent() to return a MenuShell for example.
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97731] Changed - Widget parents should be containers.
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97731
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97731 Tue Nov 5 09:07:29 2002
+++ shadow/97731.tmp.15412 Tue Nov 5 09:31:34 2002
@@ -7,13 +7,13 @@
Resolution:
Severity: enhancement
Priority: Normal
Component: general
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: matty chariot net au
-TargetMilestone: ---
+TargetMilestone: 3
URL:
Summary: Widget parents should be containers.
You would expect a widget parent to be a Container, yet the APIs have them
as ordinary Widgets. This leads to excessive casting.
--__--__--
Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:31:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97729] Changed - Warning when deleting widgets.
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97729
Changed by matty chariot net au
--- shadow/97729 Tue Nov 5 08:56:06 2002
+++ shadow/97729.tmp.15437 Tue Nov 5 09:31:46 2002
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
OS: other
OS Details:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
-Component: TreeView
+Component: general
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: matty chariot net au
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
Summary: Warning when deleting widgets.
--__--__--
Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:43:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97741] New - When i compiled my gtkmm2 program and rut it, it throws segfault
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97741
Changed by nluka email si
--- shadow/97741 Tue Nov 5 10:43:48 2002
+++ shadow/97741.tmp.30823 Tue Nov 5 10:43:49 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+Bug#: 97741
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: Red Hat 8.0
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity: critical
+Priority: Normal
+Component: build
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+ReportedBy: nluka email si
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Summary: When i compiled my gtkmm2 program and rut it, it throws segfault
+
+I use Anjuta 1.0.0. I started a new gtkmm2.0 project. Then, I copy/paste
+the code from my previus source file to the project and compiled it. Then,
+when i execudet the program, it sez:
+--------------------------------------------
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtktypeutils.c: line 40
+(gtk_type_unique): assertion `GTK_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (parent_type)' failed
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872
+(g_type_add_interface_static): assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE
+(instance_type)' failed
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtktypeutils.c: line 40
+(gtk_type_unique): assertion `GTK_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (parent_type)' failed
+
+(process:24466): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1806: initialization
+assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function
+
+(process:24466): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtktypeutils.c: line 40
+(gtk_type_unique): assertion `GTK_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (parent_type)' failed
+Segmentation fault
+---------------------------------------------------------
+But when i compiled the previus source files without anjuta 1 and executed
+it, it was all ok.
+
+I don't know if this is a Anjuta 1.0 bug or a gtkmm-2 bug.
--__--__--
Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, nluka email si
Cc:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:51:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97741] Changed - When i compiled my gtkmm2 program and rut it, it throws segfault
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97741
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/97741 Tue Nov 5 10:43:49 2002
+++ shadow/97741.tmp.10605 Tue Nov 5 13:51:29 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 97741
Product: gtkmm
Version: 2.0
OS: Linux
OS Details: Red Hat 8.0
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: INVALID
Severity: critical
Priority: Normal
Component: build
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: nluka email si
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@
Segmentation fault
---------------------------------------------------------
But when i compiled the previus source files without anjuta 1 and executed
it, it was all ok.
I don't know if this is a Anjuta 1.0 bug or a gtkmm-2 bug.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2002-11-05 13:51 -------
+This is not a bug report until you supply some simple-as-possible test
+code. For general questions, please use the mailing list.
+
+My first guess would be that you haven't use Gtk::Main().
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
