Re: [gtkmm] GCC 3.1 warning suppression patch

On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 20:47, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> It adds some redundancy but removes some warnings.
> can it go in?

Applied. But couldn't those typename declarations go in the base class?
It does make the base class look a little useless.

Patches: remember ChangeLog and bugzilla.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]