[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #212 - 7 msgs



Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot' (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 78578] Changed - Segfault when calling the MenuItem superconstructor. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 78578] Changed - Segfault when calling the MenuItem superconstructor. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 88368] Changed - signal_io() feature request (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 88368] Changed - signal_io() feature request (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, btb debian org
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:16:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot'

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90689

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90689	Thu Aug 15 13:23:56 2002
+++ shadow/90689.tmp.23588	Thu Aug 29 07:16:17 2002
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-15 02:57 -------
 OK, so let's build the documentation when we build the .h/,cc files. I
 think that means building it when we are in maintainer mode.
 
 I don't want to distribute 2 versions of the same documentation, and I
 don't want to distribute crippled documentation.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-29 07:16 -------
+I'm kind of hoping that someone provides a patch to build the 
+documentation when the .h/.cc files are built, and to add them to 
+make dist.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net, szombath bifab de
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:33:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 78578] Changed - Segfault when calling the MenuItem superconstructor.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78578

Changed by andreas holzmann epost de 

--- shadow/78578	Thu Aug 29 07:13:43 2002
+++ shadow/78578.tmp.26557	Thu Aug 29 07:33:28 2002
@@ -469,6 +469,16 @@
 fine.
 
 Yes, we do need to put this in the FAQ. We would tell people to use 
 the workaround or upgrade their compiler if they find this problem. A 
 later gcc is _not_ a requirement for gtkmm, because people don't 
 _need_ to use those convenience constructors.
+
+------- Additional Comments From Andreas Holzmann epost de  2002-08-29 07:33 -------
+Murray, yes you're right. My Gtk::Window subclass calls add() in its
+constructor (like in the Gtk::MenuItem problem). I also agree that 
+gcc > 2.95 is not a strict requirement.
+
+Maybe the old gcc has a problem working with object that are not yet
+fully initialized. The add() method call triggers some callback
+mechanisms that use the pointer of the new object. But as we are still
+in its constructor, object initialization is not yet fully finished.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net, szombath bifab de
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 78578] Changed - Segfault when calling the MenuItem superconstructor.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78578

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/78578	Thu Aug 29 07:33:28 2002
+++ shadow/78578.tmp.6986	Thu Aug 29 08:58:31 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 78578
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: Debian Testing (Woody) 13 Apr
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: NOTABUG
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: matty chariot net au               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -479,6 +479,11 @@
 gcc > 2.95 is not a strict requirement.
 
 Maybe the old gcc has a problem working with object that are not yet
 fully initialized. The add() method call triggers some callback
 mechanisms that use the pointer of the new object. But as we are still
 in its constructor, object initialization is not yet fully finished.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-29 08:58 -------
+Yes, I think it's a quite-well known dynamic_cast<> gcc bug. But we
+were confusing ourselves with other stuff. It would be nice if someone
+could patch the FAQ, ideally with a link to an actual gcc bug report.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morten wtf dk
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88368] Changed - signal_io() feature request

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88368

Changed by andreas holzmann epost de 

--- shadow/88368	Sat Jul 27 07:55:46 2002
+++ shadow/88368.tmp.23892	Thu Aug 29 10:31:21 2002
@@ -54,6 +54,16 @@
 SigC::Slot type.
 
 I have _no_ idea what this stuff does or whether it's a good idea.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-07-27 07:55 -------
 This will be punted unless a patch is provided soon.
+
+------- Additional Comments From Andreas Holzmann epost de  2002-08-29 10:31 -------
+Cannot you just pass the filedescriptor to your callback via bind()?
+
+E.g.
+  signal_io().connect(
+        bind(slot(*this, &Class::callback), filedescriptor),
+        filedescriptor, Glib::IO_IN);
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:06:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88368] Changed - signal_io() feature request

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88368

Changed by morten wtf dk 

--- shadow/88368	Thu Aug 29 10:31:21 2002
+++ shadow/88368.tmp.29170	Thu Aug 29 11:06:40 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 88368
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: INVALID
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: morten wtf dk               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@
 E.g.
   signal_io().connect(
         bind(slot(*this, &Class::callback), filedescriptor),
         filedescriptor, Glib::IO_IN);
 
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From morten wtf dk  2002-08-29 11:06 -------
+You are completely right. Sorry that I missed this.



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81422

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/81422	Wed Aug  7 16:40:16 2002
+++ shadow/81422.tmp.9059	Thu Aug 29 12:33:32 2002
@@ -106,6 +106,11 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-07 16:40 -------
 I simply don't know what bugzilla is doing with tar.gz attachements.
 What I want to do is retrieve my first attachment from bugzilla but I
 don't manage to. Could you please retrieve the attachment for me and
 send it by mail if it is not possible to get it from bugzilla's html
 interface?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-29 12:33 -------
+When I download I have to give it a something.tar.gz name if I expect
+it to be a tar.gz name. Please discuss usage of bugzilla on the
+mailing list if necessary.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:33:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81422

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/81422	Thu Aug 29 12:33:32 2002
+++ shadow/81422.tmp.9098	Thu Aug 29 12:33:57 2002
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 Product: gnomemm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: Debian Sid (x86)
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
-Severity: major
+Severity: minor
 Priority: Normal
 Component: libglademm
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: chrisime gnome org               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]