[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #189 - 4 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90088] Changed - object reference management (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 89780] Changed - signal_button_press_event is not called (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, Andreas Holzmann epost de
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:40:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90088] Changed - object reference management

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90088

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90088	Wed Aug  7 14:37:09 2002
+++ shadow/90088.tmp.10897	Sat Aug 10 13:40:14 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 90088
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: other
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: major
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: Andreas Holzmann epost de               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -36,6 +36,21 @@
 Example to reproduce the problem
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-07 14:37 -------
 I've added this to the tests directory, and I will investigate later.
 You don't need to tell me how memory management should work.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-10 13:40 -------
+I uncommented some code. Before you gave us this test I didn't know
+why we need it. Well done.
+
+2002-08-10  Murray Cumming  <murrayc usa net>
+
+	* gtk/src/object.ccg (destroy_c_instance_()): If g_object_unref()
+	doesn't cause it to be disposed then force it with
+	gtk_object_destroy(). This is necessary because adding a widget to
+	a container refs it even if it's not floating. Fixes bug #90088,
+	as seem in tests/delete_cpp_child.
+
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, steve przepiora org
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:42:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 89780] Changed - signal_button_press_event is not called

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89780

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/89780	Mon Aug  5 15:02:37 2002
+++ shadow/89780.tmp.11113	Sat Aug 10 13:42:21 2002
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
-Severity: major
+Severity: minor
 Priority: Normal
 Component: TreeView
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: steve przepiora org               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90126	Sat Aug 10 12:21:09 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.11790	Sat Aug 10 13:46:45 2002
@@ -327,6 +327,25 @@
 
 Yes and no. People who never used Gtk::SHRINK, Gtk::FILL, etc, will
 not be concerned about the change from AttachOptions to PackOptions.
 But the overloading situations give no type safety at all. Every wrong
 integral type options parameter will evaluate to the wrong member
 function without any compiler warning.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-10 13:46 -------
+A good point. Here are some reasons not to change it:
+
+- If we have a deprecated API then people will expect us to support
+_all_ of the deprecated GTK+ API. That's impossible at this stage.
+
+- We are source-API frozen, so we need a _really_ good reason to break
+the API by removing the bool, bool overrides.
+
+- The bool, bool overrides make it easy to port to gtkmm2.
+
+- If they get it wrong then they will at least see it at runtime.
+
+But I understand, and wish that it was typesafe at compile-time.
+
+
+
+By the way, why is this bug marked with the "portability" keyword?



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, MHL Schulze t-online de
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:58:15 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89951

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/89951	Sat Aug 10 11:58:34 2002
+++ shadow/89951.tmp.13300	Sat Aug 10 13:58:15 2002
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@
 Patch solving the problem for gcc 2.95.3 via namespace TreeView_Private.
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-10 10:54 -------
 Works for me. (gcc 2.96 on RH7.2)
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-10 13:58 -------
+Do also check that the editable cells example in demos/gtk-demo really
+works too. You should be able to edit the cells.




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest