Re: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #187 - 15 msgs

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 20:30, Carl Nygard wrote:
> > +Yes, if both the start and end would be equal after the method has
> > +finished then there is no need to return both as well as the return
> > +iterator.
> > +
> > +Maybe you could use end() to show that the deletion has not happened.
> > +I don't think that end() would ever be the real "location where text
> > +was deleted." That's what find() would use to show that something was
> > +not found. Or maybe you could add an overload that takes a bool&
> > +parameter.
> > 
> 
> If one calls delete_text(myIter, end()), shouldn't this work fine, and
> also return end() as the iterator?  In this case it would signify proper
> deletion of text from myIter to the end of the buffer.

We need to try this, I think. end() is a gtkmm-specific concept in
Gtk::TextView.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com