Re: [gtkmm] One thing we didn't really discuss: ustring vs string
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- To: Michael Babcock <mbabcock la creatureshop henson com>
- Cc: GTKmm Mailing List <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] One thing we didn't really discuss: ustring vs string
- Date: 08 Aug 2002 18:33:29 +0100
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 18:09, Michael Babcock wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> [snip]
> > 1. We currently use Glib::ustring whenever we are not _certain_ that the
> > string could never be UTF8. Filenames can probably never be UTF8 so they
> > should be std::string. Others might have more expertise.
>
> Why can filenames never be UTF8? I thought one of the reasons for
> creating UTF8 was to be able to use Unicode in Unix filenames, avoiding
> the null-terminated string problems of using a 16-bit wide character
> Unicode encoding.
Maybe because other systems can't cope with UTF8? I think, for instance,
that UTF8 can have null bytes in the middle. I'm not 100% sure whether
filenames can be UTF8. Other people seem to be sure that they can't, so
I defer to them.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]