Re: TreeView: Multiple selection inefficient?

[Matthias Kaeppler <nospam digitalraid com>]

Murray Cumming wrote:

> You don't have to call foreach() on each row. But if you really want to
> examine each selection whenever the selection changes, what's the
> alternative?
>
> Hopefully you more often want to just know the first and last selected
> rows, or if anything is selected at all. Then you wouldn't have to call
> foreach() on them all.

That's correct, but how can I achieve this? It would be enough for me to 
only know the first and last row which is among the selection. Maybe 
even only the last.

--
Matthias Kaeppler