RE: GLIB / Pango install
- From: "Andreas Hagele" <andreas fortunecorp com>
- To: "Russell Shaw" <rjshaw netspace net au>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: GLIB / Pango install
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:31:26 +1200
Russell,
I did start off installing from source but the fault was pretty much the
same.
I briefly looked at uninstalling but there are a million other packages that
require glib. So I don't think it would be wise to remove it altogether.
Regards
Andreas
-----Original Message-----
From: gtk-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:gtk-list-bounces gnome org]On
Behalf Of Russell Shaw
Sent: Tuesday, 6 July 2004 03:07 a.m.
Cc: gtk-list gnome org
Subject: Re: GLIB / Pango install
Andreas Hagele wrote:
> Russell,
>
> running
> rpm -i glib3-2.4.2-1.i386.rpm
> produces:
> file /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 from install of glib2-2.4.2-1 conflicts
with
> file from package glib2-2.2.1-1
> file /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 from install of glib2-2.4.2-1 conflicts
> with file from package glib2-2.2.1-1
> file /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 from install of glib2-2.4.2-1 conflicts
> with file from package glib2-2.2.1-1
> file /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 from install of glib2-2.4.2-1 conflicts
> with file from package glib2-2.2.1-1
> running
> rpm -U glib3-2.4.2-1.i386.rpm
> produces:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> glib2 = 2.2.1 is needed by (installed) glib2-devel-2.2.1-1
>
> so either way does not work. Why not?
>
> Drives me spares this thing.
> I think I'll give up on gimp 2
>
> Andreas
I haven't tackled rpms for a long time. Maybe the old packages should
be uninstalled first. Doesn't rpm have a force option?
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]