Re: Pango / Glib config problem

[Anthony <orders nodivisions com>]

> 2.2.1 is coming from an installed library somewhere on your
> system.

Of course it is; the question is *where*?  The error message tells me 
that it found 2.2.1, and that I should remove it, but it doesn't tell me 
*where* it found it.  Additionally boggling is the fact that I've 
removed every glib-2.0 folder on my system, and it still gives me the error.

> put the location of
> glib 2.2.3 ahead of it in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

My LD_LIBRARY_PATH is null.  I'll try putting the location of 2.2.3 into 
there and see if that fixes it.

-Anthony


Noah Levitt wrote:
> 2.2.1 is coming from an installed library somewhere on your
> system. You can either get rid of it or put the location of
> glib 2.2.3 ahead of it in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> Noah
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at  9:44:12 -0400, Anthony wrote:
>
> > I'm running Gnome 2.2 on Slackware 9.0, and I'm trying to upgrade to 
> > Gnome 2.4.  I'm following the order of installation on this page:
> >
> > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rninstallation.html
> >
> > So I've intalled Glib 2.2.3.  But now Pango is giving me this error:
> >
> >
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.1.3...
> > *** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.2.1)
> > *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
> > *** to remove the old version of GLib. You may also be able to fix the error
> > *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing
> > *** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is
> > *** required on your system.
> > *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH
> > *** to point to the correct configuration files
> > <<<
> >
> > It tells me where it's getting the 2.2.3 from, so why doesn't it tell me 
> > where it's getting the 2.2.1 from??
> >
> > I've gone back and removed every directory on my system named glib-2.0 
> > (after trying lots of other stuff with no success), and then 
> > re-installed Glib 2.2.3, and it's still giving me the error.
> >
> > So...
> > #1.  Where is the 2.2.1 coming from, and
> > #2.  Wouldn't it make sense for the installer(s) be changed so that they 
> > tell where they've found it, once they've found it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anthony