Re: gtk-list digest, Vol 1 #1381 - 4 msgs
- From: Graham Swallow <Information-Cascade ntlworld com>
- To: gtk-list gnome org
- Cc: gtk-list-request gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtk-list digest, Vol 1 #1381 - 4 msgs
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:09:24 +0000
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:00:07 -0500
gtk-list-request gnome org wrote:
> Send gtk-list mailing list submissions to
> gtk-list gnome org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gtk-list-request gnome org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gtk-list-admin gnome org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gtk-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Difference between 1.2 and 2.0 and 2.2 (Individual . .)
> 2. Re: Question about memory in GTK+2.x.... (Sven Neumann)
> 3. Re: Difference between 1.2 and 2.0 and 2.2 (Sven Neumann)
> 4. gtk bells & whistles (pclouds)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:26:26 -0300
> Subject: Re: Difference between 1.2 and 2.0 and 2.2
> From: "Individual . ." <individual mi cl>
> To: gtk-list gnome org
>
>
> On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >
> > http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-changes-2-0.html
> >
>
> Thanks, that was interesting.
>
> But what about personal comments? Would you recommend that I start with
> 1.3 or 2.2? Which is more widely installed?
>
> Paul
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> To: FMorales <altf2o attbi com>
> Cc: gtk-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: Question about memory in GTK+2.x....
> From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
> Date: 04 Feb 2003 11:28:09 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> FMorales <altf2o attbi com> writes:
>
> > Hello i had a quick question about allocating widgets in GTK+2.x...
> > I haven't gotten into /alot/ of programming with 2.x yet, but i
> > thought i remembered a
> > "gtk_destroy", type function to destroy objects (widgets) created
> > dynamically in 1.2 ... I.e. :
> >
> > GtkWidget * window = gtk_window_new(GTK_TOPLEVEL_WINDOW);
> > ............
> > gtk_destroy(window); /* could have been gtk_destroy_object(window) ,
> > or similar IIRC */
> > ............
>
> The function to destroy a widget is (and is has always been) called
> gtk_widget_destroy().
>
>
> Salut, Sven
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> To: "Individual . ." <individual mi cl>
> Cc: gtk-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: Difference between 1.2 and 2.0 and 2.2
> From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
> Date: 04 Feb 2003 11:31:53 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> "Individual . ." <individual mi cl> writes:
>
> > But what about personal comments? Would you recommend that I start
> > with 1.3 or 2.2? Which is more widely installed?
>
> if you start a new application, you should definitely go for the 2.0
> API. GTK+-2.2 is source and binary compatible with 2.0. The API
> reference indicates which features are new in 2.2. If wide-spread
> installation is important for you, you should perhaps not rely on
> features that have been introduced in 2.2. But then it's only a
> question of time until everyone uses 2.2.
>
>
> Salut, Sven
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:45:24 +0700
> From: pclouds <pclouds users sourceforge net>
> To: gtk-list gnome org
> Subject: gtk bells & whistles
>
> Hi
> Can i make fade effects like fade menus, fade tooltips.. and other effects
> with gtk?
> --
> Bi Cờ Lao
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
>
> End of gtk-list Digest
--
regards
--
Graham
0118-962 0693
Information-Cascade ntlworld com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]