Re: why declare non-ptr and pass with &?
- From: tino schwarze informatik tu-chemnitz de (Tino Schwarze)
- To: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: why declare non-ptr and pass with &?
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:45:59 +0100
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:29:54PM +0900, Kang Jeong-Hee wrote:
> in gtk-demo's tree_store.c source, each GtkTreeIter declared without *
> and passed with &.
> IMHO this is out of order comparing other objects and widgets.
> Is there specific reason why declare non-* and pass &?
I don't see a reason not to do it. In fact, it's less eror-prone than
allocating memory first. It should also allow the compiler to optimize
better. Pointers always complicate things but YMMV.
Bye, Tino.
--
* LINUX - Where do you want to be tomorrow? *
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]