Re: glib2 non-static recursive and rw locks?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Alex Graveley <alex ximian com> writes:
> 
> On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 18:18, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Anyway, too late until 2.2.
> 
> Argh.  There's no way we can squish this in?  It would have the exact
> same API as the static version.
> 

I don't get why it's important?

I've never used or much thought about this API, but as I said before,
you allocate dynamic memory, put the static mutex in it, and presto a
dynamic mutex. What's the issue?

Havoc