Re: gtk_timeout_change()?

["David J. Topper" <topper virginia edu>]

Paul Davis wrote:

> yes, this makes sense, but its still a bad practice to use the GUI
> event loop to deliver precisely timed events. you'd be much better off
> using sigitimer(), although alas the obvious method is to use
> sigitimer and threads, and thats a problematic area (pthreads + POSIX
> signals = headache)

But how can you have multiple timers that way?  I don't have a problem with
threads, but that seems overkill for something so simple.  Ugh.  The
drawing board has some strong gravity this week.

DT