- From: Drazen Kacar <dave arsdigita com>
- To: "J. Ali Harlow" <gtk-list optosun7 city ac uk>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtk+-1.2.10
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:13:48 +0100
J. Ali Harlow wrote:
> In the meantime, we will be forced
> to ship stable versions that subvert your check if you refuse to provide a
> workaround. The code is already written and in place. The user will see
Wow, we could play a game here. Owen scores a point whenever he releases
GTK source (or a patch, just to make the cycle shorter) which makes GTK
unusable with the existing game binaries. You score a point whenever you
release source or a patch which will work setgid with the existing GTK
binaries. To make it more interesting, patches don't have to be portable,
ie. a single OS on a specific architecture counts.
And mere mortals can take whichever side they want, but they only may
select compiler, linker and assembler flags, without changing the sources.
> I would be delighted to delete it if 1.2.9 was the only version that
> needed it.
Why, 1.2.8 and earlier should also be in the game. :-)
.-. .-. Sarcasm is just one more service we offer.
(_ \ / _)
| dave arsdigita com
] [Thread Prev