Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal

["Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com>]

at the risk of wasting more bandwidth - Havoc's the only person on this list I've *ever* had a clear response from on *any* GTK-related topic, and I for one am very grateful to him.

Please can we drop this thread now.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Smith" <jonsmith dragonstar dhs org>
To: "Steph" <steph fox btinternet com>
Cc: "Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat com>; <gtk-list gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal


> 
> I'm interested because I've also had problems with GtkTree.  I wanted
> to know which problems were inherent in the widget itself.  Sorry I
> wasted your bandwidth.

Not you, Havoc who's answer was unhelpful to you or me.

j.

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jonathan Smith" <jonsmith dragonstar dhs org>
> To: "Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat com>
> Cc: "Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com>; <gtk-list gnome org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 6:08 PM
> Subject: Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > "Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com> writes:
> > > pretty broken in what way?
> > > 
> > 
> > Any number of ways. ;-) It's just buggy.
> 
> 
> That is a remark lacking substance and a response that is even more
> lacking in substance.  It has served to handwave his argument that users
> can go to **** and that the maintainers of GTK do not care about the
> quality of their work.
> 
> WHat a waste of bandwidth.
> 
> j.
> 
> 
>