Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal
- From: "Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com>
- To: "Jonathan Smith" <jonsmith dragonstar dhs org>, "Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat com>
- Cc: <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 18:11:33 +0100
I'm interested because I've also had problems with GtkTree. I wanted to know which problems were inherent in the widget itself. Sorry I wasted your bandwidth.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Smith" <jonsmith dragonstar dhs org>
To: "Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat com>
Cc: "Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com>; <gtk-list gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: GTK 1.2 Tree Item Signal
>
> "Steph" <Steph Fox btinternet com> writes:
> > pretty broken in what way?
> >
>
> Any number of ways. ;-) It's just buggy.
That is a remark lacking substance and a response that is even more
lacking in substance. It has served to handwave his argument that users
can go to **** and that the maintainers of GTK do not care about the
quality of their work.
WHat a waste of bandwidth.
j.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]